From: "J-P. Rosen" <rosen@adalog.fr>
Subject: Re: Aspect location in expression function.
Date: Tue, 24 May 2022 12:01:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <t6iad4$263$1@dont-email.me> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <t6hlhq$vcu$1@dont-email.me>
Le 24/05/2022 à 06:05, Randy Brukardt a écrit :
> To make a functioning :LR grammar for Ada, I*had* to allow the aspect
> specification in both places, and then make one of them illegal. Which is
> more work than just allowing in either place. So I guess it is a matter of
> perspective.:-)
But if you allow it in either place, then you have to decide what
happens if it appears in /both/ places... Would you like conformance
checking? I bet no ;-)
--
J-P. Rosen
Adalog
2 rue du Docteur Lombard, 92441 Issy-les-Moulineaux CEDEX
Tel: +33 1 45 29 21 52
https://www.adalog.fr
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-24 10:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-14 11:47 Aspect location in expression function Blady
2022-05-14 15:40 ` J-P. Rosen
2022-05-24 4:05 ` Randy Brukardt
2022-05-24 10:01 ` J-P. Rosen [this message]
2022-05-25 5:17 ` Randy Brukardt
2022-05-24 18:24 ` G.B.
2022-05-25 5:20 ` Randy Brukardt
2022-05-25 18:45 ` G.B.
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox