From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on ip-172-31-65-14.ec2.internal X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.4 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!aioe.org!PjbNDCau3eS6e8nglA5Amg.user.46.165.242.75.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Nasser M. Abbasi" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: who needs types? Types makes code ugly. Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2022 05:08:53 -0500 Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server Message-ID: References: <1hrg9hd16j7hv7049g01dfjrdmhee5p2ga@4ax.com> Reply-To: nma@12000.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: gioia.aioe.org; logging-data="15899"; posting-host="PjbNDCau3eS6e8nglA5Amg.user.gioia.aioe.org"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@aioe.org"; User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.8.0 Content-Language: en-US X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.2 Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:63910 List-Id: On 6/2/2022 3:37 AM, Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote: > A more deep analysis begs the question, why don't we remove all that > ugly variables and the code itself? > > Programming by the emoji is the future! > I am afraid others have beat you to this brilliant idea ! https://levelup.gitconnected.com/5-most-amusing-programming-languages-you-can-code-using-emojis-4bfd43bc7614 "Well, smart and talented people out there have imagined and developed full-fledged programming languages that we can use to code with emojis and emoticons." I still do not know if they have strong types when using Emoji languages or not. May be you can not add a smily face to sad face? That will be type error at compile time? --Nasser