From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on
	ip-172-31-65-14.ec2.internal
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE,
	XPRIO autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Randy Brukardt" <randy@rrsoftware.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: who needs types? Types makes code ugly.
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2022 21:06:14 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID: <t8jbuo$hov$1@dont-email.me>
References: <t79ab6$a4v$1@gioia.aioe.org> <nnd$1dfb707b$1866b51a@6cddbe3899d992f0> <87wndzt8f1.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <09683835-f090-47ce-8a39-467e5fb3167an@googlegroups.com> <87fskmty0c.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <l20j9h9dbsilro6mtr79prg1p1fift4gid@4ax.com> <871qw5ty1t.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <jfv2hsF2jgfU1@mid.individual.net> <t7e8v9$3et$1@dont-email.me> <66a25bd1-e92c-477a-95da-5d365a6967a2n@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2022 02:06:16 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="c5a559faedc5471fa05a68e4be48f7f4";
	logging-data="18207"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19nstpnGA1gPgWjull71bRnugP067gVA7Q="
Cancel-Lock: sha1:C7aquY/jBRPo2imB5yk2eX8+JKw=
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.7246
X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:63990
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


"Wesley Pan" <wesley.y.pan@gmail.com> wrote in message 
news:66a25bd1-e92c-477a-95da-5d365a6967a2n@googlegroups.com...
> On Friday, June 3, 2022 at 5:28:28 PM UTC-7, Randy Brukardt wrote:
>> It is not likely that there will be an Ada 2022 Rationale, as no one has
>> stepped up to write it or pay John Barnes write it. The closest thing we
>> have is the Jeff Cousins overview, which I can't find an on-line 
>> reference
>> to (or my copy, for that matter). I'll check with Jeff and hopefully get
>> more information.
>>
>> Randy.
>
> How much would it likely cost to pay someone to generate the Ada2022 
> rationale? Maybe the community can join together to help fund the work?

Dunno, you'd have to ask John.

I did get a copy of Jeff Cousin's overview that I'll put up on Ada-Auth.org 
when I get time (probably not until next month).

                        Randy.