From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on ip-172-31-65-14.ec2.internal X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,NICE_REPLY_A, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "G.B." Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: New aggregates with Ada 2022. Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2022 12:53:12 +0200 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Message-ID: References: Reply-To: nonlegitur@notmyhomepage.de MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2022 10:53:12 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="d693f7f922fab079e7262433f7db058b"; logging-data="28193"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+XED6H/R4SRB2Ho6rpMgC7zTPmE2h9v5o=" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.10.0 Cancel-Lock: sha1:zlBR5ttQCGg+7IMEJj17YriQcoU= In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:64021 List-Id: On 23.06.22 11:32, Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote: > In any case having an explicit array interface does not preclude built-in arrays. Indeed, if there were no built-in arrays, how would one - specify aspects like "contiguous memory", - permit implementations to create efficient addressing for arrays' storage units - map to hardware?