From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on
	ip-172-31-65-14.ec2.internal
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!aioe.org!gz+JwLUglqIuIsOsQSSzqA.user.46.165.242.91.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Good news
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2022 15:38:06 +0200
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID: <t9f07u$m1s$1@gioia.aioe.org>
References: <t9eolv$12pfc$1@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Info: gioia.aioe.org; logging-data="22588"; posting-host="gz+JwLUglqIuIsOsQSSzqA.user.gioia.aioe.org"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@aioe.org";
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/91.10.0
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.2
Content-Language: en-US
Xref: reader01.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:64042
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 2022-06-28 13:29, J-P. Rosen wrote:
> A recent survey 
> (https://www.analyticsinsight.net/top-10-outdated-programming-languages-to-forget-in-2022/) 
> 
> enumerated the "TOP 10 OUTDATED PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES TO FORGET IN 
> 2022". Although it mentionned COBOL, Pascal,
> Objective-C among others, it didn't mention Ada.
> Let's hope that it's not because the journalist didn't even know about 
> Ada...
> 
> Disclaimer: anyway, I don't think there is any value in that kind of 
> survey,
> I was just afraid of seeing Ada mentionned...

A site called "Analytics Insight?"

   "No!" interrupted Owl, who was wise.
   "I have good eye-sight, insight, and foresight.
   How could an intelligent hare make such a silly mistake?"
       -- The Story Of The Hare Who Lost His Spectacles

For sure, they listed criteria of "outdated" and then shown how these 
languages fulfill them. No? I am shocked! (:-))

-- 
Regards,
Dmitry A. Kazakov
http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de