From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on ip-172-31-65-14.ec2.internal X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: John McCabe Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Carbon Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2022 09:16:33 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Message-ID: References: <19e1d6b3-7bf6-4411-b9d4-10415d297aa1n@googlegroups.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2022 09:16:33 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: reader01.eternal-september.org; posting-host="786321662bbeaa500a4405c6829d5547"; logging-data="4016176"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX199y7dVNbAMSH8dAyfo3cuh4iZ+TFIlB2o=" User-Agent: PhoNews/3.9.1 (Android/8.1.0) Cancel-Lock: sha1:3UX3lzb82fks3Aa06U0OoS8A+LE= In-Reply-To: <19e1d6b3-7bf6-4411-b9d4-10415d297aa1n@googlegroups.com> Xref: reader01.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:64168 List-Id: On 29/07/2022 20:05, Gautier write-only address wrote: >Le vendredi 29 juillet 2022 à 13:03:39 UTC+2, John McCabe a écrit : > >> The alternative would be to go and join a team that's already >> using Ada, but every Ada job I've seen come up locally is to support code >> that was written in Ada 95; I'd rather be looking at Ada 2005 -> if I was >> to make that jump. > >It should not be a problem, since each version of Ada is compatible with the previous one. >You can bring in whatever new feature is supported, especially in new packages or projects. >It's only a problem if your boss requires to stick with Ada 95. It's the latter; it mostly appears to be jobs that have a contractual need to use the same compiler that was used to develop the original code 20 years ago, as it's known, certified etc.