From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on
	ip-172-31-65-14.ec2.internal
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_20,NICE_REPLY_A,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "G.B." <bauhaus@notmyhomepage.invalid>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: MS going to rust (and Linux too)
Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2022 09:13:23 +0200
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID: <tgov2k$389re$1@dont-email.me>
References: <tgmd02$eio$1@gioia.aioe.org> <tgmu7p$1flk$1@gioia.aioe.org>
 <tgn147$nf5$1@gioia.aioe.org> <tgngbj$31hq1$1@dont-email.me>
 <tgnkgj$170g$1@gioia.aioe.org>
Reply-To: nonlegitur@notmyhomepage.de
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2022 07:13:24 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader01.eternal-september.org; posting-host="95529f0dcc1602cfaf7c563b7cbe8104";
	logging-data="3417966"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/EuAOXvSHQ2rueoZx4lrQiNH6cBBQ9P+g="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:91.0)
 Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.13.1
Cancel-Lock: sha1:GZmhkV/sqpy/5hqzYbXOQGbBJCM=
In-Reply-To: <tgnkgj$170g$1@gioia.aioe.org>
Content-Language: en-US
Xref: reader01.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:64402
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 24.09.22 21:07, Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote:

> Huh, in not so distant future I expect drivers using HTTP to communicate inside the kernel encoding data in JSON and XML and written in Java script... I am almost serious. This garbage triumphally marches across embedded world right now, so no smiley.
  
Example:
DNS over HTTP. Done because when HTTP is secured using TLS,
it still allows for proxy servers to intercept in an already
sanctioned way.

If the technically minded were to speak against this setup,
then a convincing argument is required.
Specifically, the argument needs to present an alternative
solution to be economically and politically more valuable
than DNS-over-HTTP whilst also preserving the proxies'
capabilities (economically and politically).

In case you have a suggestion in favor of DNSSEC, say,
please disseminate.

There is a tricky bit, though. DNSSEC must look better on
all accounts than buying DNS-over-HTTP appliances.
Given some background noise generated by complaints about
performance, speed might become an influential factor.