From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on ip-172-31-65-14.ec2.internal X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,NICE_REPLY_A, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Jeffrey R.Carter" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: New compiler error with new compiler Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2022 11:29:29 +0100 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2022 10:29:29 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: reader01.eternal-september.org; posting-host="f398e66b28be6f914ccc9a196fbec34d"; logging-data="904955"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18qqkLV/yFJsxxm4ZOxjH271UMm+y0t9DQ=" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.4.2 Cancel-Lock: sha1:nXO7MJMqDuEuSxoEofVQjJJzTcc= In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US Xref: reader01.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:64681 List-Id: On 2022-12-08 05:07, Jerry wrote: > So the correctness of an Ada program can depend on the processor that it runs on? The code you presented is compiler-dependent. It cannot be presumed to be portable to another compiler, or even (as you discovered) to another version of the same compiler. -- Jeff Carter “[T]here are lots of people out there writing software that should really be out cleaning toilets instead.” Brian Catlin 173