From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on
	ip-172-31-65-14.ec2.internal
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD,
	FREEMAIL_FROM,NICE_REPLY_A,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Rod Kay <rodakay5@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Real_Arrays on heap with overloaded operators and clean syntax
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2023 17:34:06 +1100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID: <tql9oc$3gtgn$1@dont-email.me>
References: <9c7cccd9-733f-49a8-b482-087ccb14b58dn@googlegroups.com>
 <tqkg88$39v71$3@dont-email.me>
 <2039b788-bbbd-4c8e-9785-4e45d4a2027en@googlegroups.com>
 <tqkh64$39v71$4@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2023 06:33:49 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader01.eternal-september.org; posting-host="f2406f80d8a139156a3308bf3c4cc5d0";
	logging-data="3700247"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+g+aS2art8aRqAtOLYfEhsi2QoiV3vUQQ="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.7.0
Cancel-Lock: sha1:jYWyWeFH21uw6/QWdZ5rO+FHVgU=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <tqkh64$39v71$4@dont-email.me>
Xref: reader01.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:64864
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 23/1/23 10:34, Rod Kay wrote:
> On 23/1/23 10:20, Jim Paloander wrote:
>>>> Dear ADA lovers,
>>>> with stack allocation of Real_Vector ( 1 .. N ) when N >= 100,000 I 
>>>> get STACK_OVERFLOW ERROR while trying to check how fast operator 
>>>> overloading is working for an expression
>>>>
>>>> X := A + B + C + C + A + B, where
>>>> A,B,C,X are all Real_Vector ( 1 .. N ).
>>>>
>>>> So my only option was to allocate on the heap using new. But then I 
>>>> lost the clean syntax
>>>>
>>>> X := A + B + C + C + A + B
>>>>
>>>> and I had to write instead:
>>>>
>>>> X.all := A.all + B.all + C.all + C.all + A.all + B.all.
>>>>
>>>> This is really ugly and annoying because when you are using 
>>>> Real_Arrays for implementing some linear algebra method who relies 
>>>> heavilly on matrix vector products and vector updates, you do need 
>>>> to allocate on the heap (sizes are determined in runtime) and you do 
>>>> need a clean syntax. So, is there any way to simplify my life 
>>>> without using the .all or even without declaring A,B,C,X as access 
>>>> Real_Vector?
>>>> Thanks for your time!
>>> If you are on linux, then you could set the stack size with
>>>
>>> $ ulimit -s unlimited
>>> $ launch_my_app
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards.
>> On Windows 10 with mingw64?
> 
>     Not sure. I don't have a windows machine.
> 
>     What happens when try ?
> 
>        $ ulimit -a


ulimit is available on cygwin.

It is not available on mingw64 then ?