From: "Jeffrey R.Carter" <spam.jrcarter.not@spam.acm.org.not>
Subject: Re: ChatGPT
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2023 01:00:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <u054as$pra7$1@dont-email.me> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3db3c046-bbcf-497b-afd5-ac6c2b9567afn@googlegroups.com>
On 2023-03-30 23:49, Anatoly Chernyshev wrote:
>
> What do you think?
No doubt there are a large number of such programs in the training data. If it
had simply regurgitated one of those, at least the program would have compiled.
That it couldn't even do as good as that is not impressive.
--
Jeff Carter
"Fundamental improvements in performance
are most often made by algorithm changes,
not by tuning."
Elements of Programming Style
201
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-30 23:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-30 21:49 ChatGPT Anatoly Chernyshev
2023-03-30 22:32 ` ChatGPT Jerry
2023-04-01 12:10 ` ChatGPT Hou Van Boere
2023-03-30 23:00 ` Jeffrey R.Carter [this message]
2023-03-31 6:54 ` ChatGPT Dmitry A. Kazakov
2023-03-31 11:04 ` ChatGPT magardner2010
2023-03-31 21:44 ` ChatGPT Anatoly Chernyshev
2023-04-01 7:39 ` ChatGPT Dmitry A. Kazakov
2023-04-07 1:51 ` ChatGPT Ken Burtch
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox