From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on
	ip-172-31-65-14.ec2.internal
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,NICE_REPLY_A,
	T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
Path: eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: ChatGPT
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2023 08:54:59 +0200
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID: <u06043$19uam$1@dont-email.me>
References: <3db3c046-bbcf-497b-afd5-ac6c2b9567afn@googlegroups.com>
 <u054as$pra7$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2023 06:54:59 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="74716646f6338a3f18d85c78ac1064a4";
	logging-data="1374550"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX198EVeZWwfbVwXCwsu1vFRU4n0ZwSr6omU="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.9.1
Cancel-Lock: sha1:wCK/z7j2v6spbXkI7sz+lOb8l7Y=
In-Reply-To: <u054as$pra7$1@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-US
Xref: feeder.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:65030
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 2023-03-31 01:00, Jeffrey R.Carter wrote:
> On 2023-03-30 23:49, Anatoly Chernyshev wrote:
>>
>> What do you think?
> 
> No doubt there are a large number of such programs in the training data. 
> If it had simply regurgitated one of those, at least the program would 
> have compiled. That it couldn't even do as good as that is not impressive.

Right. Fun would be adding qualifiers to the request. E.g. "in extended 
precision", "taking arguments from user input" etc. Parroting works up 
to some limit.

What I find interesting is that the whole swindle highlights that some 
human activities considered creative are in fact not. BTW, it repeats 
much earlier dethroning of playing chess as being indicative to human 
intellect. The machine easily beats us in chess.

Actually, it is the abilities to sort out garbage and pick up vegetables 
which make us intelligent! (:-))

-- 
Regards,
Dmitry A. Kazakov
http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de