From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,a0833bbed8752e1f
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!proxad.net!193.252.118.146.MISMATCH!news.wanadoo.fr!news.wanadoo.fr!not-for-mail
Sender: obry@PASCAL
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: variable length strings
References: <ba2f9c57.0410210952.438515d@posting.google.com>
 <1861614.TWv5A9FgVL@linux1.krischik.com>
 <4178e979_1@baen1673807.greenlnk.net>
 <1195374.UMjBCk7lO1@linux1.krischik.com>
 <UDSed.6962$d5.59024@newsb.telia.net>
 <1154613.ipZcUgduzp@linux1.krischik.com>
 <PaSdnX0j54BWCeDcRVn-jA@megapath.net> <ln2llc.e3u.ln@skymaster>
 <1174011.lJ1dcgRM3Q@linux1.krischik.com> <uwtxd9y9j.fsf@obry.org>
 <1098814048.280053@master.nyc.kbcfp.com> <u8y9tmea3.fsf@obry.org>
 <rlssm80bgp2.fsf_-_@jacob.crs4.it> <uwtxcla1n.fsf@obry.Organization: LJK
 Software <PTzuwe3GsIg6@eisner.encompasserve.org> <ulldsl3c0.fsf@obry.org>
 <10z8k19febkic.16ex86io5uvwi.dlg@40tude.net>
From: Pascal Obry <pascal@obry.org>
Organization: Home - http://perso.wanadoo.fr/pascal.obry
User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3
Date: 27 Oct 2004 18:38:29 +0200
Message-ID: <uekjkktfe.fsf@obry.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
NNTP-Posting-Host: AVelizy-151-1-40-76.w82-120.abo.wanadoo.fr
X-Trace: 1098895110 news.wanadoo.fr 3835 82.120.22.76:2619
X-Complaints-To: abuse@wanadoo.fr
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:5776
Date: 2004-10-27T18:38:29+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


"Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> writes:

> But the existing Get_Line does not reaches the goal either. Normally it is
> used with the buffer allocated on the stack. So it is the stack again.

That's wrong!

   procedure Get_Line(Item : out String; Last : out Natural);

The buffer is bounded in this case, it's up to you to read a chunk of data
(using a small buffer on the stack) and do whatever is needed with it. So I
see not problem with the standard Get_Line. I never said that you can't use
the stack, just that using a buggy Get_Line implementation as proposed here
could heat too much stack space and is therefore unsafe.

Pascal.

-- 

--|------------------------------------------------------
--| Pascal Obry                           Team-Ada Member
--| 45, rue Gabriel Peri - 78114 Magny Les Hameaux FRANCE
--|------------------------------------------------------
--|              http://www.obry.org
--| "The best way to travel is by means of imagination"
--|
--| gpg --keyserver wwwkeys.pgp.net --recv-key C1082595