From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Luke A. Guest" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada vs. Rust for low level system software Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2023 09:10:20 +0000 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2023 09:10:20 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="c0b0708571a78581d72eec11af88f613"; logging-data="114444"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19eifB4CdXHptZRAQgP3iNRo8GKPEEkcNY=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:m9Jtjd1wsifpu8kqKKszECUeY2U= In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-GB Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:65913 List-Id: On 13/12/2023 08:27, Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote: > What for? Any language comparisons lost their meaning long ago as the > whole language business degraded into hobbyist/corporate bullshit. True. >> Since Ada is mainly used in this area, why has Rust, which is much >> younger language, and target this same area has gained so much >> popularity but not Ada? I would say because they aimed to be a C++ replacement. > Because it is always someone's arbitrary decision. True. > Then of course Rust continues the worst practices tried by Ada and C++: > templates/generics, macros. What's the alternative to generics?