From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: streaksu Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: systemd controversy Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2024 18:05:20 +0100 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2024 17:05:20 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="8483139d647b704c34711924f556ee88"; logging-data="305407"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18kyT7Of109Mpo5epnAryk8t4moChAShlA=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:acWebVh3rjdYp558HMUGEm2EJWE= In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:66139 List-Id: On 3/13/24 22:55, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: > If you are writing code that will run as one or more server processes, you > will likely also want to provide scripts/config to manage those processes. > For systemd, that could be service definition files. Not relevant to the whole overarching discussion, but to my understanding, that might be better managed by distribution / OS maintainers, rather than developers. When thinking about programs like daemons, or other similar pieces on a bigger system, with all the variety of systems, init systems, and programs around, who best to do it than the people that are ultimately orchestrating the whole ecosystem.