From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,9cccf6ef6149fdaa X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Robert A Duff Subject: Re: Ada Date: 2000/01/04 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 568178533 Sender: bobduff@world.std.com (Robert A Duff) References: <38620350.48F8FC08@gecm.com> <83tohh$q2s$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <83u8l0$5i5$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <84rd2f$snm$1@nntp3.atl.mindspring.net> <84rphr$ql5$1@nntp8.atl.mindspring.net> Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 2000-01-04T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Hyman Rosen writes: > You have not read the literature correctly, or you have not read the > correct literature :-) C++ templates can be (according to the standard, > but not yet in reality) separately compiled, and many errors within the > template can be caught before instantiation. You are correct in that it > is unlikely that a C++ will offer anything but the full-expansion style > of template instantiation. The C++ standard allows templates to be separately compiled. And the Ada standard allows garbage collection. And the C standard allows array-bounds checking. ;-) - Bob