From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,80155a886d197693
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed2.dallas1.level3.net!news.level3.com!newsfeed-00.mathworks.com!nntp.TheWorld.com!not-for-mail
From: Robert A Duff <bobduff@shell01.TheWorld.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Conditional Compilation in Ada
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 16:13:30 -0400
Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA
Message-ID: <wcczlbq23yt.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
References: 
 <5618a901-6b05-4a60-8362-7821261da50b@f19g2000yqo.googlegroups.com>
 <768c8117-d8af-4a04-b27e-2e74b69c1e8b@y17g2000yqn.googlegroups.com>
 <15ce8441-af38-4498-b3ed-c0517ad87dc6@x3g2000yqa.googlegroups.com>
 <d6acda9e-09f6-45fe-80c0-07282191ae0c@t13g2000yqt.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: shell01.theworld.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: pcls6.std.com 1246306410 10347 192.74.137.71 (29 Jun 2009 20:13:30
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@TheWorld.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 20:13:30 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) Emacs/21.3 (irix)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:CjJ+ELN9rGQ+0ze7RRYvmBxxrSM=
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:6730
Date: 2009-06-29T16:13:30-04:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Chrono <pablittto@gmail.com> writes:

> Well, creating folders for each scenario is definitely not a better
> solution than using a prep script, mainly in a project with high
> complexity in its architecture.

It is better in some ways, and worse in other ways.  It's certainly
possible to make a real mess of things by scattering preprocessor
commands all over the place.

Anyway, GNAT comes with a preprocessor.  You can find
info in the documentation.

>... Even creating new packages for doing
> this (or new variables which are going to be compiled with main code),
> due to requirements restrictions.

I don't understand what you mean by that.

>...But thanks even though for all
> responses.

- Bob