From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,aee8ed05a978aff9 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!news.zanker.org!border2.nntp.ams.giganews.com!border1.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-hub.cableinet.net!blueyonder!peer-uk.news.demon.net!kibo.news.demon.net!news.demon.co.uk!demon!not-for-mail From: Simon Wright Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Is this definition legal? Date: 19 Sep 2004 12:25:00 +0100 Organization: Pushface Sender: simon@smaug.pushface.org Message-ID: References: <8119488.4vhKC6FDza@linux1.krischik.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: pogner.demon.co.uk Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: news.demon.co.uk 1095593457 535 62.49.19.209 (19 Sep 2004 11:30:57 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2004 11:30:57 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1 Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:3841 Date: 2004-09-19T12:25:00+01:00 List-Id: Martin Krischik writes: > "Legal" questions should be send to ada-comment@ada-auth.org. They > are the guys who can not only "advice" but also "decide" on such > issues. I'm not sure this is good advice, isn't that list for discussion of proposals for changes to the standard? -- Simon Wright 100% Ada, no bugs.