From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,c406e0c4a6eb74ed
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!proxad.net!fr.ip.ndsoftware.net!216.196.110.149.MISMATCH!border2.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-hub.cableinet.net!blueyonder!peer-uk.news.demon.net!kibo.news.demon.net!news.demon.co.uk!demon!not-for-mail
From: Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: ADA Popularity Discussion Request
Date: 12 Sep 2004 14:47:10 +0100
Organization: Pushface
Sender: simon@smaug.pushface.org
Message-ID: <x7vllffzjj5.fsf@smaug.pushface.org>
References: <49dc98cf.0408110556.18ae7df@posting.google.com>
 <ba2f9c57.0408211523.389cf201@posting.google.com>
 <GVZVc.9513$3O3.1068@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net>
 <ba2f9c57.0408221618.475d5941@posting.google.com>
 <oZnWc.31328$9Y6.14222@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net>
 <e749549b.0408261308.70d9239c@posting.google.com>
 <cgn6sd$snk$2@a1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de>
 <e749549b.0408271022.47abd0e2@posting.google.com>
 <1198227.gWQ0keDDOY@linux1.krischik.com>
 <e749549b.0408302325.50587be2@posting.google.com>
 <x7vllfsa3mc.fsf@smaug.pushface.org> <oba1ic.vm1.ln@legolas.gidenstam.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: pogner.demon.co.uk
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: news.demon.co.uk 1094997182 22604 62.49.19.209 (12 Sep 2004 13:53:02
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2004 13:53:02 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:3616
Date: 2004-09-12T14:47:10+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

anders@legolas.gidenstam.se (Anders Gidenstam) writes:

> In article <x7vllfsa3mc.fsf@smaug.pushface.org>,
> 	Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org> writes:
> > The reference (after a _very_ strange compilation problem) loops with
> > 3.16a1; with 5.02a1 it does something which looks not unreasonable...
[...]
> Btw, I suppose you meant "does something which looks unreasonable"
> above, right? :)
> (Or does it work with 5.02a?! That would be a suprise..) 

Since I don't know what it is supposed to do I can't tell whether what
it seems to do is right. The program terminates without an exception
after printing out progress messages .. that's all I meant.

-- 
Simon Wright                               100% Ada, no bugs.