From: Marin David Condic <nobody@noplace.com>
Subject: Re: Abstract Operations On A Tagged Record
Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2004 22:27:10 GMT
Date: 2004-11-01T22:27:10+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2Lyhd.16453$ta5.8609@newsread3.news.atl.earthlink.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2uncfjF2c34toU1@uni-berlin.de>
Yes. I was originally tossing something out as "This is what I desire
even if the language doesn't accommodate me..." I understand that
without the parameters tacked on, the original base class operation
isn't going to do anything useful for me. (Other than remind me I need
to make something that *does* do the job later...) I think the best
answer is to include another tagged type for the variable parameter
content that is to come in the child classes. Thanks.
MDC
Nick Roberts wrote:
>
> Does this make sense?
>
--
======================================================================
Marin David Condic
I work for: http://www.belcan.com/
My project is: http://www.jsf.mil/NSFrames.htm
Send Replies To: m o d c @ a m o g
c n i c . r
"Power corrupts. Absolute power is kind of neat"
-- John Lehman, Secretary of the Navy 1981-1987
======================================================================
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-11-01 22:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-10-30 13:04 Abstract Operations On A Tagged Record Marin David Condic
2004-10-30 14:34 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2004-10-30 16:07 ` Nick Roberts
2004-11-01 12:58 ` Marin David Condic
2004-11-01 18:09 ` Nick Roberts
2004-11-01 22:27 ` Marin David Condic [this message]
2004-11-06 13:17 ` Marin David Condic
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox