From: Jerry <list_email@icloud.com>
Subject: Re: Latest suggestion for 202x
Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2019 22:14:03 -0700 (PDT)
Date: 2019-06-15T22:14:03-07:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <688d9097-f308-4e34-b97b-f0bd9b9f9ec2@googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <728c4668-8fa0-4a57-a502-2bf476fc3940@googlegroups.com>
On Saturday, June 15, 2019 at 4:59:41 PM UTC-7, Micah Waddoups wrote:
> Following is my comment of appreciation AND my suggestion that is a very basic and important level of support for Unicode.
>
> Frankly, the former rules for directly specifying the contents of an array were perfect, when you can only use parenthesis. Being able to use square brackets to improve the readability of an array is brilliant because it is familiar to those who use other languages and it does very little to change what is already part of the language definition (square brackets are already use in a way that does not conflict). Therefore, it is not confusing, just new.
I agree strongly about using square brackets for arrays. It is such an obvious use considering standard mathematical notation that I have never understood why it is not allowed. Readability and an obvious abstraction related to the real world--it's a no-brainer as far as I know. But I'll bet the gurus will show me to be wrong. One problem at this late date is that you would have to allow both [] and () and so you're going to forget to use [] sometimes and then you have a mixed mini-mess.
Jerry
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-16 5:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-15 23:59 Latest suggestion for 202x Micah Waddoups
2019-06-16 5:14 ` Jerry [this message]
2019-06-16 7:17 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2019-06-16 10:22 ` Egil H H
2019-06-16 16:54 ` Maciej Sobczak
2019-06-16 20:09 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2019-06-17 6:54 ` Egil H H
2019-06-17 7:42 ` J-P. Rosen
2019-06-17 12:01 ` Mart van de Wege
2019-06-17 13:35 ` Maciej Sobczak
2019-06-17 15:20 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2019-06-17 15:32 ` Paul Rubin
2019-06-17 16:43 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2019-06-17 21:38 ` Keith Thompson
2019-06-18 15:48 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2019-06-20 22:21 ` Randy Brukardt
2019-06-21 9:42 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2019-06-21 18:12 ` Keith Thompson
2019-06-21 18:43 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2019-06-21 20:24 ` Keith Thompson
2019-06-22 6:54 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2019-06-22 8:43 ` Randy Brukardt
2019-06-22 9:00 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2019-06-22 17:44 ` Keith Thompson
2019-06-22 18:34 ` Bill Findlay
2019-06-22 18:37 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2019-06-23 7:38 ` G.B.
2019-06-23 8:29 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2019-06-23 18:34 ` Optikos
2019-06-23 19:20 ` Dennis Lee Bieber
2019-06-22 20:48 ` Optikos
2019-06-22 20:53 ` Optikos
2019-06-23 17:42 ` Dennis Lee Bieber
2019-06-24 5:07 ` J-P. Rosen
2019-06-24 5:40 ` Paul Rubin
2019-06-24 7:16 ` Niklas Holsti
2019-06-26 18:00 ` Stephen Leake
2019-06-24 13:07 ` J-P. Rosen
2019-06-24 11:12 ` Stefan.Lucks
2019-06-24 12:06 ` Niklas Holsti
2019-06-24 20:22 ` Randy Brukardt
2019-06-24 20:32 ` Keith Thompson
2019-06-24 20:47 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2019-06-24 13:10 ` J-P. Rosen
2019-06-22 8:36 ` Randy Brukardt
2019-06-22 17:39 ` Keith Thompson
2019-06-16 19:34 ` Optikos
2019-06-16 20:10 ` John Perry
2019-06-16 20:57 ` Optikos
2019-06-16 21:36 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2019-06-17 16:48 ` G. B.
2019-06-17 17:12 ` Paul Rubin
2019-06-16 21:41 ` Lucretia
2019-06-19 2:36 ` Micah Waddoups
2019-06-19 11:14 ` Lucretia
2019-06-19 11:45 ` briot.emmanuel
2019-06-19 14:34 ` Optikos
2019-06-19 19:29 ` Lucretia
2019-06-19 16:12 ` G. B.
2019-06-23 20:17 ` Per Sandberg
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox