201. Re: Ada Videos
- by Robert Dewar @ 1995-01-28 17:49 UTC [22%]
202. Re: T'Machine_Mantissa et al. not uniquely defined in Ada95?
- by Robert Dewar @ 1995-01-28 22:45 UTC [22%]
203. Re: EMX/GCC and GNAT on OS/2
- by Robert Dewar @ 1995-01-30 4:33 UTC [22%]
204. Re: Ada 2 Disc CDROM Set
- by Robert Dewar @ 1995-01-31 11:22 UTC [22%]
205. Re: Ada 9X Doc v5.99
- by Robert Dewar @ 1995-02-06 15:27 UTC [22%]
206. Re: FSF drops Apple boycott, opens gate for GNAT, etc.
- by Robert Dewar @ 1995-02-07 3:03 UTC [22%]
207. Re: L'OBJET: A new journal (in French) on object technology.
- by Robert Dewar @ 1995-02-08 13:52 UTC [22%]
208. Re: Another SBIR, and Ada is still missing in action
- by Robert Dewar @ 1995-02-09 4:43 UTC [22%]
209. Re: Passive tasks (was: bounded strings)
- by Robert Dewar @ 1995-02-10 1:51 UTC [22%]
210. Re: Rational Apex vs Verdix development system
- by Robert Dewar @ 1995-02-10 17:22 UTC [22%]
211. Re: How come so much traffic on comp.lang.ada??
- by Robert Dewar @ 1995-02-11 13:48 UTC [22%]
212. Re: Another SBIR, and Ada is still missing in action
- by Robert Dewar @ 1995-02-11 13:50 UTC [22%]
213. Re: FSF drops Apple boycott, opens gate for GNAT, etc.
- by Robert Dewar @ 1995-02-11 13:55 UTC [22%]
214. Re: Ada self-referential operators
- by Robert Dewar @ 1995-02-11 13:56 UTC [22%]
215. Re: Problem with Address Clauses
- by Robert Dewar @ 1995-02-11 13:57 UTC [22%]
216. Re: Type extension with GNAT
- by Robert Dewar @ 1995-02-23 3:14 UTC [22%]
217. Re: Debugging w/ GNAT on Sun Machine???
- by Robert Dewar @ 1995-02-23 3:14 UTC [22%]
218. Re: Wanted: Well written Ada FFT
- by Robert Dewar @ 1995-02-25 4:17 UTC [22%]
219. Re: ANSI C allows extensions (was: Problem with Address Clauses)
- by Robert Dewar @ 1995-02-25 21:19 UTC [22%]
220. Re: Assembler to Ada Reverse Ratio o
- by Robert Dewar @ 1995-03-01 15:41 UTC [22%]
221. Re: Use of generic child formal package
- by Robert Dewar @ 1995-03-02 2:48 UTC [22%]
222. Re: Comparison and Communication between C++ and ADA
- by Robert Dewar @ 1995-03-03 19:13 UTC [22%]
223. Re: Problem with child package
- by Robert Dewar @ 1995-03-03 22:52 UTC [22%]
224. Re: Pragma Interfacing Problem
- by Robert Dewar @ 1995-03-06 10:42 UTC [22%]
225. Re: Implement Inheritance (Ada83)?
- by Robert Dewar @ 1995-03-07 12:19 UTC [22%]
226. Re: Pointers
- by Robert Dewar @ 1995-03-07 12:20 UTC [22%]
227. Re: GNAT for Linux
- by Robert Dewar @ 1995-03-08 1:09 UTC [22%]
228. Re: [Q] Ada Archive?
- by Robert Dewar @ 1995-03-08 15:55 UTC [22%]
229. Re: Writing a Mac Ada compiler
- by Robert Dewar @ 1995-03-08 15:57 UTC [22%]
230. Re: ADA FUNCTIONS TO PROCEDURES
- by Robert Dewar @ 1995-03-09 12:05 UTC [22%]
231. Re: ADA FUNCTIONS TO PROCEDURES
- by Robert Dewar @ 1995-03-09 12:06 UTC [22%]
232. Re: WTB: DOS ADA Compiler
- by Robert Dewar @ 1995-03-10 14:24 UTC [22%]
233. Re: ada compiler for os/2
- by Robert Dewar @ 1995-03-10 14:26 UTC [22%]
234. Re: keyboard polling in ADA
- by Robert Dewar @ 1995-03-12 3:32 UTC [22%]
235. Re: looking for FORTRAN to Ada translators
- by Robert Dewar @ 1995-03-19 0:44 UTC [22%]
236. Re: WANTED Ada83
- by Robert Dewar @ 1995-03-19 0:52 UTC [22%]
237. Re: Need complex Math Package
- by Robert Dewar @ 1995-03-19 15:25 UTC [22%]
238. Re: Syntax question
- by Robert Dewar @ 1995-03-19 20:53 UTC [22%]
239. Re: Access to subprograms
- by Robert Dewar @ 1995-03-21 11:12 UTC [22%]
240. Re: An observation of Ada (may offend)
- by Robert Dewar @ 1995-03-21 21:02 UTC [22%]
241. Re: Higher precision and generics
- by Robert Dewar @ 1995-03-21 21:14 UTC [22%]
242. Re: Differences between RM 5.0 and 6.0
- by Robert Dewar @ 1995-03-21 21:32 UTC [22%]
243. Re: GNAT on Mac
- by Robert Dewar @ 1995-03-22 13:51 UTC [22%]
244. Re: C++ to Ada95, help please
- by Robert Dewar @ 1995-03-23 13:30 UTC [22%]
245. Re: ADA context sensitive editor
- by Robert Dewar @ 1995-03-23 13:31 UTC [22%]
246. Re: Decent ADA compiler on a Mac
- by Robert Dewar @ 1995-03-23 21:55 UTC [22%]
247. Re: An observation of Ada (may offend)
- by Robert Dewar @ 1995-03-24 0:38 UTC [22%]
248. Re: Does memory leak?
- by Robert Dewar @ 1995-03-24 11:44 UTC [22%]
249. Re: Fed OOPS ... OOPS! We forgot to include Ada!
- by Robert Dewar @ 1995-03-24 21:46 UTC [22%]
250. Re: Request for Info re Nyberg's AARM
- by Robert Dewar @ 1995-03-24 22:34 UTC [22%]
251. Re: comp.lang.ada.jobs ???
- by Robert Dewar @ 1995-03-24 22:35 UTC [22%]
252. Re: Form Feed To Printer
- by Robert Dewar @ 1995-03-26 4:00 UTC [22%]
253. Re: Calling Ada from C
- by Robert Dewar @ 1995-03-26 11:53 UTC [22%]
254. Re: An observation of Ada (may offend)
- by Robert Dewar @ 1995-03-27 23:16 UTC [22%]
255. Re: GNAT 2.00 - What "ambiguous expression"
- by Robert Dewar @ 1995-03-27 23:19 UTC [22%]
256. Re: GNAT and subunits
- by Robert Dewar @ 1995-04-04 0:00 UTC [22%]
257. Re: Why no exception hierarchy ?
- by Robert Dewar @ 1995-04-04 0:00 UTC [22%]
258. Re: Why no exception hierarchy ?
- by Robert Dewar @ 1995-04-04 0:00 UTC [22%]
259. Re: Decent ADA compiler on a Mac
- by Robert Dewar @ 1995-04-04 0:00 UTC [22%]
260. Re: Unconstrained Objects
- by Robert Dewar @ 1995-04-04 0:00 UTC [22%]
261. Re: Why no exception hierarchy ?
- by Robert Dewar @ 1995-04-06 0:00 UTC [22%]
262. Re: Why no exception hierarchy ?
- by Robert Dewar @ 1995-04-06 0:00 UTC [22%]
263. Re: ISO standards (see Ada95 chpt. 1.2)
- by Robert Dewar @ 1995-04-06 0:00 UTC [22%]
264. Re: 100+ Ada Positions !!
- by Robert Dewar @ 1995-04-06 0:00 UTC [22%]
265. Re: Fixed-point question
- by Robert Dewar @ 1995-04-06 0:00 UTC [22%]
266. Re: SEI abandons Ada
- by Robert Dewar @ 1995-04-06 0:00 UTC [22%]
267. Re: Unconstrained Objects
- by Robert Dewar @ 1995-04-06 0:00 UTC [22%]
268. Re: Can we use GDB.
- by Robert Dewar @ 1995-04-06 0:00 UTC [22%]
269. Re: Language Efficiency
- by Robert Dewar @ 1995-04-07 0:00 UTC [22%]
270. Re: SEI abandons Ada
- by Robert Dewar @ 1995-04-07 0:00 UTC [22%]
271. Re: GNAT function calling overhead
- by Robert Dewar @ 1995-04-07 0:00 UTC [22%]
272. Re: gnat for Open/VMS - Anyone
- by Robert Dewar @ 1995-04-07 0:00 UTC [22%]
273. Re: GNAT 2.04 compilation problem under Linux
- by Robert Dewar @ 1995-04-07 0:00 UTC [22%]
274. Re: GNAT function calling overhead
- by Robert Dewar @ 1995-04-07 0:00 UTC [22%]
275. Re: Unconstrained Objects
- by Robert Dewar @ 1995-04-07 0:00 UTC [22%]
276. Re: Heterogeneous file I/O
- by Robert Dewar @ 1995-04-19 0:00 UTC [22%]
277. Re: Language Efficiency
- by Robert Dewar @ 1995-04-19 0:00 UTC [22%]
278. Re: GNATMAKE missing from GNAT for dos 2.04 ??
- by Robert Dewar @ 1995-04-19 0:00 UTC [22%]
279. Re: GNAT RPC stub generation
- by Robert Dewar @ 1995-04-19 0:00 UTC [22%]
280. Re: Which first-course languages? (was: What schools use Eiffel (was: No top schools use Ada)) ?
- by Robert Dewar @ 1995-04-19 0:00 UTC [22%]
281. Re: Problems with proofs
- by Robert Dewar @ 1995-04-19 0:00 UTC [22%]
282. Re: Language Efficiency
- by Robert Dewar @ 1995-04-19 0:00 UTC [22%]
283. Re: Ada95 Data Structures
- by Robert Dewar @ 1995-04-20 0:00 UTC [22%]
284. Re: Ada binaries pretty large
- by Robert Dewar @ 1995-04-20 0:00 UTC [22%]
285. Re: HELP! nested CASE statement
- by Robert Dewar @ 1995-04-20 0:00 UTC [22%]
286. Re: gnat working with Linux gcc 2.5.8 ?
- by Robert Dewar @ 1995-04-21 0:00 UTC [22%]
287. Re: Ada saved by gnat (was Re: Where's Aetech?)
- by Robert Dewar @ 1995-04-21 0:00 UTC [22%]
288. Re: Record rep-clauses
- by Robert Dewar @ 1996-01-08 0:00 UTC [22%]
289. Re: GNAT : Exception traceback
- by Robert Dewar @ 1996-02-17 0:00 UTC [22%]
290. Re: Ada is almost useless in embedded systems
- by Robert Dewar @ 1996-02-17 0:00 UTC [22%]
291. Re: C/C++ knocks the crap out of Ada
- by Robert Dewar @ 1996-02-17 0:00 UTC [22%]
292. Re: C/C++ knocks the crap out of Ada
- by Robert Dewar @ 1996-02-17 0:00 UTC [22%]
293. Re: Ada is almost useless in embedded systems
- by Robert Dewar @ 1996-02-18 0:00 UTC [22%]
294. Re: getchar and get()
- by Robert Dewar @ 1996-02-18 0:00 UTC [22%]
295. Re: PVM, MPI, Ada?
- by Robert Dewar @ 1996-02-21 0:00 UTC [22%]
296. Re: on OO differnces between Ada95 and C++
- by Robert Dewar @ 1996-02-21 0:00 UTC [22%]
297. Re: OS/2 - Latest emx version?
- by Robert Dewar @ 1996-02-22 0:00 UTC [22%]
298. Re: Complex numbers package
- by Robert Dewar @ 1996-02-23 0:00 UTC [22%]
299. Re: Can compilers do this?
- by Robert Dewar @ 1996-02-23 0:00 UTC [22%]
300. Re: Ada and OS/2
- by Robert Dewar @ 1996-02-24 0:00 UTC [22%]
301. Re: Wanted : graphic package for education
- by Robert Dewar @ 1996-02-24 0:00 UTC [22%]
302. Re: Ada 95 Compatibility
- by Robert Dewar @ 1996-02-26 0:00 UTC [22%]
303. Re: Elaboration order
- by Robert Dewar @ 1996-03-18 0:00 UTC [22%]
304. Re: Side-effect arithmetic again [was: Ada ... in embedded systems]
- by Robert Dewar @ 1996-03-18 0:00 UTC [22%]
305. Re: A programmer gets a part time job
- by Robert Dewar @ 1996-03-18 0:00 UTC [22%]
306. Re: Unconstrained array aggregation..sq. peg into round hole?
- by Robert Dewar @ 1996-03-19 0:00 UTC [22%]
307. Re: A programmer gets a part time job
- by Robert Dewar @ 1996-03-19 0:00 UTC [22%]
308. Re: how can I see the c-code generated by GNAT
- by Robert Dewar @ 1996-03-19 0:00 UTC [22%]
309. Re: Ada policy enforcement
- by Robert Dewar @ 1996-03-22 0:00 UTC [22%]
310. Re: Gripe about Ada, rep specs that won't.
- by Robert Dewar @ 1996-03-22 0:00 UTC [22%]
311. Re: Ada95 input output - simple question from novice
- by Robert Dewar @ 1996-03-24 0:00 UTC [22%]
312. Re: GNAT 3.03 for OS/2
- by Robert Dewar @ 1996-03-25 0:00 UTC [22%]
313. Re: Gripe about Ada, rep specs that won't.
- by Robert Dewar @ 1996-03-26 0:00 UTC [22%]
314. Re: Ada RCAS code thrown away; IBM/Loral/SBIS under indictment
- by Robert Dewar @ 1996-03-26 0:00 UTC [22%]
315. Re: Gripe about Ada, rep specs that won't.
- by Robert Dewar @ 1996-03-26 0:00 UTC [22%]
316. Re: From Ada83 to Ada95 ??
- by Robert Dewar @ 1996-03-26 0:00 UTC [22%]
317. Re: Unix Haters
- by Robert Dewar @ 1996-03-26 0:00 UTC [22%]
318. Re: gnat user's guide
- by Robert Dewar @ 1996-03-26 0:00 UTC [22%]
319. Re: GNAT.OS_Lib a portable OS interface?
- by Robert Dewar @ 1996-03-27 0:00 UTC [22%]
320. Re: GNAT.OS_Lib a portable OS interface?
- by Robert Dewar @ 1996-03-27 0:00 UTC [22%]
321. Re: Unix Haters
- by Robert Dewar @ 1996-03-27 0:00 UTC [22%]
322. Re: type casting tagged types in the wrong direction
- by Robert Dewar @ 1996-03-28 0:00 UTC [22%]
323. Re: Language Implementation Survey
- by Robert Dewar @ 1996-03-31 0:00 UTC [22%]
324. Re: Unix Haters
- by Robert Dewar @ 1996-04-01 0:00 UTC [22%]
325. Re: Q: on redefinition of "=
- by Robert Dewar @ 1996-04-01 0:00 UTC [22%]
326. Re: Unix Haters
- by Robert Dewar @ 1996-04-01 0:00 UTC [22%]
327. Re: Correction to previous post
- by Robert Dewar @ 1996-04-05 0:00 UTC [22%]
328. Re: File System in ADA
- by Robert Dewar @ 1996-04-05 0:00 UTC [22%]
329. Re: GNAT symbolic task names
- by Robert Dewar @ 1996-04-06 0:00 UTC [22%]
330. Re: Access vs. Address ?
- by Robert Dewar @ 1996-04-08 0:00 UTC [22%]
331. Re: ANSI C and POSIX (was Re: C/C++ knocks the crap out of Ada)
- by Robert Dewar @ 1996-04-09 0:00 UTC [22%]
332. Re: ANSI C and POSIX (was Re: C/C++ knocks the crap out of Ada)
- by Robert Dewar @ 1996-04-10 0:00 UTC [22%]
333. Re: Subprogram Renaming
- by Robert Dewar @ 1996-04-11 0:00 UTC [22%]
334. Re: Updating my Ada after 1990 - What is GNAT?
- by Robert Dewar @ 1996-04-13 0:00 UTC [22%]
335. Re: ANSI C and POSIX (was Re: C/C++ knocks the crap out of Ada)
- by Robert Dewar @ 1996-04-16 0:00 UTC [22%]
336. Re: ANSI C and POSIX (was Re: C/C++ knocks the crap out of Ada)
- by Robert Dewar @ 1996-04-16 0:00 UTC [22%]
337. Re: How to do Generic function?
- by Robert Dewar @ 1996-04-18 0:00 UTC [22%]
338. Re: gnat debuggers?
- by Robert Dewar @ 1996-04-18 0:00 UTC [22%]
339. Re: GNAT Executables: How low can you go?
- by Robert Dewar @ 1996-04-19 0:00 UTC [22%]
340. Re: Help with Text_IO Instantiation!
- by Robert Dewar @ 1996-04-22 0:00 UTC [22%]
341. Re: Ada Core Technologies and Ada95 Standards
- by Robert Dewar @ 1996-04-24 0:00 UTC [22%]
342. Re: HELP:Declaration in ADA?!!
- by Robert Dewar @ 1996-04-24 0:00 UTC [22%]
343. Re: Dispatching in Ada95
- by Robert Dewar @ 1996-04-24 0:00 UTC [22%]
344. Re: OpenVMS Ada95 Capability (was ACT & Ada95 in comp.lang.ada)
- by Robert Dewar @ 1996-04-24 0:00 UTC [22%]
345. Re: Dispatching in Ada95
- by Robert Dewar @ 1996-04-29 0:00 UTC [22%]
346. Re: What's ADA?
- by Robert Dewar @ 1996-05-02 0:00 UTC [22%]
347. Re: GNAT 3.01 Source For OS/2
- by Robert Dewar @ 1996-05-03 0:00 UTC [22%]
348. Re: Some questions about Ada.
- by Robert Dewar @ 1996-05-04 0:00 UTC [22%]
349. Re: Data Dictionary creator
- by Robert Dewar @ 1996-05-04 0:00 UTC [22%]
350. Re: Some questions about Ada.
- by Robert Dewar @ 1996-05-05 0:00 UTC [22%]
351. Re: Some questions about Ada.
- by Robert Dewar @ 1996-05-05 0:00 UTC [22%]
352. Re: Gnat 3.03/Linux/ELF problem
- by Robert Dewar @ 1996-05-06 0:00 UTC [22%]
353. Re: Ada-95 Success Stories
- by Robert Dewar @ 1996-05-25 0:00 UTC [22%]
354. Re: gnat tasking under DOS?
- by Robert Dewar @ 1996-05-27 0:00 UTC [22%]
355. Re: Configuration Management for Ada on Unix
- by Robert Dewar @ 1996-05-31 0:00 UTC [22%]
356. Re: Ada-95 Success Stories
- by Robert Dewar @ 1996-06-03 0:00 UTC [22%]
357. Re: Form feed comment for pragma Page
- by Robert Dewar @ 1996-06-03 0:00 UTC [22%]
358. Re: Ada tasking issues
- by Robert Dewar @ 1996-06-06 0:00 UTC [22%]
359. Re: next "big" language?? (disagree)
- by Robert Dewar @ 1996-06-07 0:00 UTC [22%]
360. Re: next "big" language?? (disagree)
- by Robert Dewar @ 1996-06-07 0:00 UTC [22%]
361. Re: Is the "Ada mandate" being reconsidered?
- by Robert Dewar @ 1996-06-09 0:00 UTC [22%]
362. Re: Hex to Dez conversion?
- by Robert Dewar @ 1996-06-09 0:00 UTC [22%]
363. Re: Form feed comment for pragma Page
- by Robert Dewar @ 1996-06-12 0:00 UTC [22%]
364. Re: on calling Ada from C/C++
- by Robert Dewar @ 1996-06-13 0:00 UTC [22%]
365. Re: Q: memory management
- by Robert Dewar @ 1996-06-20 0:00 UTC [22%]
366. Re: Gnat 2.06 Ada95 (unix) File format????
- by Robert Dewar @ 1996-06-20 0:00 UTC [22%]
367. Re: GNAT 301a with Win95
- by Robert Dewar @ 1996-06-21 0:00 UTC [22%]
368. Re: Q: memory management
- by Robert Dewar @ 1996-06-21 0:00 UTC [22%]
369. Re: access types and dispatching subprograms
- by Robert Dewar @ 1996-06-23 0:00 UTC [22%]
370. Re: Q: Memory management
- by Robert Dewar @ 1996-06-26 0:00 UTC [22%]
371. Re: Building an Ada compiler
- by Robert Dewar @ 1996-06-28 0:00 UTC [22%]
372. Re: Assertions (was: Re: next "big" language?? (disagree))
- by Robert Dewar @ 1996-06-28 0:00 UTC [22%]
373. Re: Q: unboxed values and polymorphism
- by Robert Dewar @ 1996-06-28 0:00 UTC [22%]
374. Re: Announcement: Razor 4.0 available.
- by Robert Dewar @ 1996-06-28 0:00 UTC [22%]
375. Re: OS specific support in ADA
- by Robert Dewar @ 1996-06-29 0:00 UTC [22%]
376. Re: Data compression (in Ada)
- by Robert Dewar @ 1996-06-29 0:00 UTC [22%]
377. Re: Pragma Import(Windows?
- by Robert Dewar @ 1996-06-30 0:00 UTC [22%]
378. Re: Q: access to subprogram
- by Robert Dewar @ 1996-07-03 0:00 UTC [22%]
379. Re: GNAT Codesize
- by Robert Dewar @ 1996-07-06 0:00 UTC [22%]
380. Re: Q: access to subprogram
- by Robert Dewar @ 1996-07-08 0:00 UTC [22%]
381. Re: Floating point problem with GNAT -- Help needed !
- by Robert Dewar @ 1996-07-08 0:00 UTC [22%]
382. Re: separate keyword and separate compilation with GNAT?
- by Robert Dewar @ 1996-07-10 0:00 UTC [22%]
383. Re: seperate keyword and seperate compilation with Gnat?
- by Robert Dewar @ 1996-07-11 0:00 UTC [22%]
384. Re: Exceptions: Are they GOTOs?
- by Robert Dewar @ 1996-07-13 0:00 UTC [22%]
385. Re: Exceptions: Are they GOTOs?
- by Robert Dewar @ 1996-07-14 0:00 UTC [22%]
386. Re: C is 'better' than Ada because...
- by Robert Dewar @ 1996-07-15 0:00 UTC [22%]
387. Re: C is 'better' than Ada because...
- by Robert Dewar @ 1996-07-17 0:00 UTC [22%]
388. Re: Concurrency in Gnat 3.05?
- by Robert Dewar @ 1996-07-20 0:00 UTC [22%]
389. Re: seperate keyword and seperate compilation with Gnat?
- by Robert Dewar @ 1996-07-20 0:00 UTC [22%]
390. Re: Concurrency in Gnat 3.05?
- by Robert Dewar @ 1996-07-20 0:00 UTC [22%]
391. Re: C is 'better' than Ada because...
- by Robert Dewar @ 1996-07-21 0:00 UTC [22%]
392. Re: Should I learn C or Pascal?
- by Robert Dewar @ 1996-07-22 0:00 UTC [22%]
393. Re: "use" clauses and Ada 95 OOP
- by Robert Dewar @ 1996-07-23 0:00 UTC [22%]
394. Re: Prevalence of Compilers for Which Integer'Size < 32?
- by Robert Dewar @ 1996-07-30 0:00 UTC [22%]
395. Re: Multiple reasons for failure of Ariane 5 (was: Re: Ariane 5 - not an exception?)
- by Robert Dewar @ 1996-08-07 0:00 UTC [22%]
396. Re: Ada is 'better' than C because...
- by Robert Dewar @ 1996-08-08 0:00 UTC [22%]
397. Re: Changing discriminants at run-time: erroneous execution?
- by Robert Dewar @ 1996-08-10 0:00 UTC [22%]
398. Re: What's the best language to learn? [was Re: Should I learn C or Pascal?]
- by Robert Dewar @ 1996-08-14 0:00 UTC [22%]
399. Re: What's the best language to learn? [was Re: Should I learn C or Pascal?]
- by Robert Dewar @ 1996-08-15 0:00 UTC [22%]
400. Re: Looking for generic hash function
- by Robert Dewar @ 1996-08-16 0:00 UTC [22%]
Results 201-400 of ~7510 next [<= 22%] | prev [>= 22%] | reverse | options above
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox