From: benson@felixstowe.em.slb.com (Ewan Benson)
Subject: generic call backs
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 1994 17:08:43
Date: 1994-09-27T17:08:43+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <benson.5.001125B5@felixstowe.em.slb.com> (raw)
Hi,
I'm posting this for a (remote) colleague who doesn't have access to the net
at present (and I haven't seen a FAQ for this group) so here goes.
He has two packages A and B
Package A contains a 'with B'
Package B contains a call to a subroutine in A, but for his own reasons he
does not want to use a 'with B' in package A. He's convinced it can be done
but can't find any info in his Booch reference.
Any help in this direction would be gratefully received
Thanks for your patience
Ewan (going back to comp.lang.c and the int main (void) flames !!)
############################################################################
# Ewan Benson # #
# Schlumberger Industries Electricity Management # #
# # For every action there #
# E-Mail benson@felixstowe.em.slb.com # is an equal and #
# Tel ++ 44 394 694472 # opposite criticism. #
# Fax ++ 44 394 694444 # #
# # #
############################################################################
next reply other threads:[~1994-09-27 17:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1994-09-27 17:08 Ewan Benson [this message]
1994-09-28 12:13 ` generic call backs Kevin V. Sobilo
1994-09-28 21:29 ` Robert Dewar
1994-09-29 21:03 ` Wayne Magor
1994-10-03 4:50 ` Robert Dewar
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox