From: Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org>
Subject: Re: Peculiarities of "of" syntax
Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2020 11:27:22 +0000
Date: 2020-01-12T11:27:22+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <lywo9wzzhh.fsf@pushface.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 56cb7bc3-b966-4708-8cc7-657712d77047@googlegroups.com
"Alejandro R. Mosteo" <amosteo@unizar.es> writes:
> A normal function call will work there too, so why not the poor infix
> operator...
This is OK too:
-- 3a)
for Z of "&" (Arr, Arr) loop
null;
end loop;
(the switch Bob Duff mentioned, to do semantic analysis even if syntax
fails, is -gnatq)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-01-12 11:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-01-11 18:05 Peculiarities of "of" syntax Alejandro R. Mosteo
2020-01-11 20:25 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2020-01-11 21:45 ` Robert A Duff
2020-01-12 1:38 ` Alejandro R. Mosteo
2020-01-12 2:01 ` Robert A Duff
2020-01-12 11:27 ` Simon Wright [this message]
2020-01-13 23:32 ` Randy Brukardt
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox