From: "J-P. Rosen" <rosen@adalog.fr>
Subject: Re: Image attribute (yet again)
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2020 14:33:29 +0200
Date: 2020-04-27T14:33:29+02:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <r86jep$93r$1@dont-email.me> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <670160da-e66d-446f-a415-27df39d9a73f@googlegroups.com>
Le 26/04/2020 à 19:33, Jere a écrit :
> I'm not saying it can't be done. I'm saying by the time I go through
> all the processing needed, I might as well wrote my own function. It
> makes the existing operation mostly useless (unless I just want a
> temporary debug print that I don't care how it looks). For example,
> if I want to print to a 16x2 character LCD screen and I want to print
> 0 padded 4 digit hex values with no "16#" prefix or "#" ending, then
> I need to call Put with an 8 character string, search for the first
> occurrence of '#' (it can be in multiple locations), then overwrite
> a variable number of those characters with 0's (based on the location
> of '#'), and then extract the 4 digits I actually need. All doable
> (not saying it cannot be done), but at that point, I am better off
> just doing my own custom operation instead instead of even using the
> Put operation.
Right. If you want you own format, write it. It will take you less time
than writing this message. For the benefit of everybody, here it is:
Hex_Digits : constant array (Bits_16 range 0..15) of Character
:= "0123456789ABCDEF";
function Hex_Image (Value : Bits_16) return String is
Result : String (1 .. 4);
Current : Bits_16 := Value;
begin
for I in reverse Result'Range loop
Result (I) := Hex_Digits (Current mod 16);
Current := Current / 16;
end loop;
return Result;
end Hex_Image;
> It feels like the Put operation wasn't designed
> with usability in mind. Just the presence of the "16#" and "#"
> around the value makes using the operation more clunky than it
> should be. If that had been left out or if the operation at least
> allowed for padding the actual numeric value inside the result,
> then it would have been much more usable.
Text_IO was designed for file operations, not so much for interactive
IO. And there is an important feature of Text_IO which is rarely
mentioned: If you use only the appropriate operations from Text_IO (no
'Image), and your program writes into a file, you can take the sequence
of code that writes the file, replace every Put_* operation by the
symetric Get_* operation, and you will read the file without error.
This feature requires that if you write a number in a certain base, then
you need to recognize the base when reading. So it's not an error, but a
design decision. Of course, like any design decision, you may agree with
it or not.
--
J-P. Rosen
Adalog
2 rue du Docteur Lombard, 92441 Issy-les-Moulineaux CEDEX
Tel: +33 1 45 29 21 52, Fax: +33 1 45 29 25 00
http://www.adalog.fr
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-27 12:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-20 15:24 Image attribute (yet again) Stephen Davies
2020-04-25 22:35 ` Stephen Davies
2020-04-26 6:05 ` J-P. Rosen
2020-04-26 14:16 ` Jere
2020-04-26 17:09 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2020-04-26 17:33 ` Jere
2020-04-27 12:33 ` J-P. Rosen [this message]
2020-04-27 12:50 ` Jere
2020-04-27 13:42 ` J-P. Rosen
2020-04-27 14:05 ` Jere
2020-04-27 14:55 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2020-04-28 6:04 ` J-P. Rosen
2020-04-27 14:10 ` Jere
2020-04-28 6:02 ` J-P. Rosen
2020-04-28 13:03 ` Jere
2020-04-26 18:40 ` Oliver Kellogg
2020-04-26 18:42 ` Oliver Kellogg
2020-04-26 18:43 ` Oliver Kellogg
2020-04-27 12:52 ` Jere
2020-05-20 1:52 ` Shark8
2020-04-26 18:57 ` Stephen Davies
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox