From: lance@eco.twg.com (Lance Kibblewhite)
Subject: Re: Ada NEWS -- Week Ending 7 Oct 1994
Date: 12 Oct 1994 18:35:44 GMT
Date: 1994-10-12T18:35:44+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <37haa0$baf@scoop.eco.twg.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 1994Oct7.181343.9070@sei.cmu.edu
In article <1994Oct7.181343.9070@sei.cmu.edu>, adanews@ajpo.sei.cmu.edu (Ada Information Clearinghouse) writes:
>*****************************************************************
> ATTENTION Ada 95 VENDORS AND DEVELOPERS!
>*****************************************************************
>DATELINE: October 7, 1994
>
>The Defense Information Systems Agency (DISA) Center for Standards
>would like to invite your participation in the finalization of an
>Ada 95 Mapping to the Object Management Group's Common Object
>Request Broker Architecture (CORBA) Interface Design Language
>(IDL).
>
>MITRE and Objective Interface Systems (OIS) have developed a draft
>Ada 95 mapping document and are preparing implementations based on
^^^^^^
>the mapping. The ACM SIGAda Bindings Working Group is preparing an
>Ada 83 mapping that will be compatible with the Ada 95 mapping.
^^^^^^
So is "Ada 95" more 'correct' then "Ada 94"?
-- Lance.
next parent reply other threads:[~1994-10-12 18:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1994Oct7.181343.9070@sei.cmu.edu>
1994-10-12 18:35 ` Lance Kibblewhite [this message]
1994-10-13 3:32 ` Ada NEWS -- Week Ending 7 Oct 1994 Tucker Taft
1994-10-13 15:23 ` Dave McAllister
1994-10-13 19:55 ` Robert Dewar
1994-10-14 1:40 ` David Weller
1994-10-14 2:17 ` Richard Kenner
1994-10-14 14:28 ` Norman H. Cohen
1994-10-14 14:28 ` ncohen
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox