From: davemc@shindo.esd.sgi.com (Dave McAllister)
Subject: Re: Ada NEWS -- Week Ending 7 Oct 1994
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 1994 15:23:30 GMT
Date: 1994-10-13T15:23:30+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CxMAr6.EFD@odin.corp.sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: CxLDu4.9MB@inmet.camb.inmet.com
I personally like the 9X designation. In fact, I went 'on record' in 1992 at the
Ada/Australia conference that 9X should be left as the designation.
If he products are solid and timely, why dump all the coverage hte 9X name has
today?
Dave McAllister
--
Product Manager, Compilers
Silicon Graphics, Inc
*SHINDO - the ART of the MIND*
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1994-10-13 15:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1994Oct7.181343.9070@sei.cmu.edu>
1994-10-12 18:35 ` Ada NEWS -- Week Ending 7 Oct 1994 Lance Kibblewhite
1994-10-13 3:32 ` Tucker Taft
1994-10-13 15:23 ` Dave McAllister [this message]
1994-10-13 19:55 ` Robert Dewar
1994-10-14 1:40 ` David Weller
1994-10-14 2:17 ` Richard Kenner
1994-10-14 14:28 ` Norman H. Cohen
1994-10-14 14:28 ` ncohen
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox