From: Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org>
Subject: Re: Configurable Run Time without GPR Tools
Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2019 09:18:22 +0000
Date: 2019-11-05T09:18:22+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ly1rumy941.fsf@pushface.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: qprbs5$1985$1@gioia.aioe.org
"Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> writes:
> On 2019-11-05 06:47, Daniel Way wrote:
>> - are the GPR tools absolutely necessary for building a run time, or
>> is there another way to compile standard library packages?
> They are not necessary. You can use gnatmake or even just gcc and
> gnatbind etc. Yet gprbuild saves a huge amount of time and work,
> especially for large projects. It is also quite powerful and safe when
> it comes to multiple targets within same project. It really pays off
> to learn it a bit.
If you look at e.g. $prefix/arm-eabi/lib/gnat/zfp-stm32f4 you'll see
runtime.xml which gprbuild uses to control the target-specific switches
for the compiler and linker. It saves a lot of grief to let gprbuild do
this.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-05 9:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-05 5:47 Configurable Run Time without GPR Tools Daniel Way
2019-11-05 8:28 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2019-11-05 8:43 ` Daniel Way
2019-11-05 8:59 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2019-11-05 9:14 ` Simon Wright
2019-11-05 15:15 ` Shark8
2019-11-05 9:18 ` Simon Wright [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox