From: Matteo Bertini <matteob@naufraghi.net>
Subject: Re: Ada-Python inter-language testing
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 09:15:04 GMT
Date: 2005-01-18T09:15:04+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ss4Hd.9426$fs6.227087@twister2.libero.it> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <x7voefn930j.fsf@smaug.pushface.org>
oh, yes, unit-testing is there only because this is and university exam
related work, I was thinking about integration in general!
PolyORB could be very interesting, for example it seems to support
exception passing, and in my coding I'm finding it very hard to have.
By the way consider also ctypes[1], once exported a la C, ctypes can
access every function in a dll with a little pure python coding (on the
fly).
[1] http://starship.python.net/crew/theller/ctypes/
Thanks for the answers,
Matteo Bertini
Simon Wright wrote:
> One of us is considering CORBA (PolyORB on the Ada (GNAT) side,
> omniORB on the Python side). I can see it for integration support,
> but for unit testing .. I don't think so, but we shall see!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-01-18 9:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-01-17 12:21 Ada-Python inter-language testing Matteo Bertini
2005-01-17 13:32 ` Martin Krischik
2005-01-17 19:11 ` Stephen Leake
2005-01-17 21:09 ` Simon Wright
2005-01-18 9:15 ` Matteo Bertini [this message]
2005-01-18 21:37 ` Jerome Hugues
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox