comp.lang.ada
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: jls@summit.novell.com (-mlc-+Schilling J.)
Subject: Re: C++ bashing (was Re: Vendor bashing? Sort of.)
Date: 20 Sep 1994 09:58:47 -0400
Date: 1994-09-20T09:58:47-04:00	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <35mpqnINNi2e@marble.summit.novell.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 35isfn$pqd@felix.seas.gwu.edu

In article <35isfn$pqd@felix.seas.gwu.edu> mfeldman@seas.gwu.edu (Michael Feldman) writes:
>
>C++ chugged out of AT&T as a preprocessor

Saying this (because the first C++ compilers happened to take advantage
of C as an already existing, portable code generator) is equivalent to 
calling GNAT a preprocessor (because it happens to take advantage of the
gcc back end as an already existing, portable code generator).

In fact, both are true compilers, not preprocessors.  Their choice of
intermediate representations carries with them both benefits and costs, 
as is always true in compiler design.

-- 
Jonathan Schilling
Novell, UNIX Systems Group (UNIX System Laboratories)
jls@summit.novell.com



  parent reply	other threads:[~1994-09-20 13:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
1994-09-08 13:53 Air Force shows how meaningless Ada waiver process is Rhoda Metzger
1994-09-08 17:36 ` John R. Cobarruvias
1994-09-08 19:14 ` Greg Annoyingme gets tricky (was: Re: Air Force shows how meaningless Ada waiver process is) Ted Dennison
1994-09-08 20:16   ` John R. Cobarruvias
1994-09-13  9:46 ` Air Force shows how meaningless Ada waiver process is Richard A. O'Keefe
1994-09-13 16:14   ` Michael Feldman
1994-09-13 20:14     ` Robert Dewar
1994-09-14  2:46       ` Vendor bashing? Sort of Michael Feldman
1994-09-14 13:17         ` Mitch Gart
1994-09-15 13:28           ` Robert Dewar
1994-09-16 15:26             ` Michael Feldman
1994-09-16  1:56           ` Michael Feldman
1994-09-16 14:16             ` Gregory Aharonian
1994-09-16 18:23               ` Quo Vadis Ada Market?(was Re: Vendor bashing? Sort of.) david.c.willett
1994-09-17  0:11               ` Vendor bashing? Sort of Robert Dewar
1994-09-18 14:02                 ` Gregory Aharonian
1994-09-19 15:20                   ` david.c.willett
1994-09-19 17:11                   ` Kent Mitchell
1994-09-19 11:48                 ` Ted Dennison
1994-09-19 19:16             ` Kent Mitchell
1994-09-27  4:26               ` Michael Feldman
1994-09-27 16:38                 ` Kent Mitchell
1994-09-14 14:30         ` Mike Ryer
1994-09-15 13:30           ` Robert Dewar
1994-09-19  2:19             ` Michael Feldman
1994-09-19  3:52               ` Robert Dewar
1994-09-22 16:43                 ` Michael Feldman
1994-09-22 22:11                   ` Richard Kenner
     [not found]                   ` <35svf1$77i@cmcl2.nyu.edu>
1994-09-27  4:19                     ` Michael Feldman
1994-09-27 14:35                       ` M3 Network Objects (Formerly: bashing? Sort of.) Anthony Gargaro
1994-09-19 19:20               ` Vendor bashing? Sort of Erik Naggum
1994-09-20 13:58               ` -mlc-+Schilling J. [this message]
1994-09-20 21:51                 ` C++ bashing (was Re: Vendor bashing? Sort of.) Robert Dewar
1994-09-24 18:53                   ` Fred McCall
1994-10-04 16:03                     ` -mlc-+Schilling J.
1994-10-04 18:44                       ` Robert Dewar
1994-10-05 14:24                         ` -mlc-+Schilling J.
1994-09-14 13:49       ` Air Force shows how meaningless Ada waiver process is Christopher Costello
1994-09-17 12:40       ` Fred McCall
1994-09-22 17:15         ` Was... Air Force shows... Now... Vendor Bashing Chris Eveleigh
replies disabled

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox