comp.lang.ada
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas <fantome.forums.tDeContes@free.fr.invalid>
Subject: License for small Ada.* complements
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2022 01:28:40 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <62d88fa8$0$18729$426a34cc@news.free.fr> (raw)

hi :-)


i would like your opinion please, about which license i should use for a 
part of my libraries.


i begun from a very small Ada.* complement :
http://svn.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/rapid/trunk/mcc_gui/mcc-str.ads?view=m
arkup&pathrev=268

at that point, it was obvious to me that the smallness of the code meant 
that it would be better for the common good to release it into the 
public domain, than under any free software license.


now i've added some code to this, and i want to continue.

...and I'm thinking about switching to a license like LGPL.

do you have an opinion about that?

isn't that too disadvantageous in some cases?
for example, if gnat wants to integrate my code, is LGPL compatible 
enough with their own license?

-- 
RAPID maintainer
http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/rapid/

             reply	other threads:[~2022-07-20 23:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-07-20 23:28 Thomas [this message]
2022-07-23  7:59 ` License for small Ada.* complements Stephen Leake
2022-07-23 12:21   ` Thomas
2022-07-23 13:00     ` Thomas
2022-07-24 12:45       ` Stephen Leake
2022-07-24 14:16         ` Thomas
2022-07-24 20:06           ` Stephen Leake
2022-07-25 23:36             ` Thomas
2022-07-31  8:48               ` Stephen Leake
2022-07-24 12:44     ` Stephen Leake
2022-07-24 14:20       ` Thomas
2022-07-24 20:02         ` Stephen Leake
2022-07-25 17:21           ` Simon Wright
2022-07-25 23:53           ` Thomas
2022-07-25  8:35 ` Fabien Chouteau
2022-07-25 23:26   ` Thomas
replies disabled

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox