Re: License for small Ada.* complements

[Thomas <fantome.forums.tDeContes@free.fr.invalid>]

In article <86mtcyu1c6.fsf@stephe-leake.org>,
 Stephen Leake <stephen_leake@stephe-leake.org> wrote:

> Thomas <fantome.forums.tDeContes@free.fr.invalid> writes:
> 
> > In article <86sfmsi7ir.fsf@stephe-leake.org>,
> >  Stephen Leake <stephen_leake@stephe-leake.org> wrote:
> >
> >> Thomas <fantome.forums.tDeContes@free.fr.invalid> writes:
> >> 
> >> > i would like your opinion please, about which license i should use for a 
> >> > part of my libraries.
> >> 
> >> Always use the GPL unless you have a specific reason not to; ie, a
> >> customer asks/pays for a different license.
> >
> > do you use GPL rather than LGPL on libraries ??
> 
> Yes; GPL 3 has a better way of handling libraries.

could you precise me please?

does it allow to use it in any proprietary program, as required for this 
kind of generic libraries?


do you use "pragma License Modified_GPL" or "pragma License GPL" on 
libraries?

-- 
RAPID maintainer
http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/rapid/