* Re: Win32Ada Linker Problem [not found] <20040328100010.A912D4C40A0@lovelace.ada-france.org> @ 2004-03-28 13:00 ` Andrew Carroll 2004-03-28 16:17 ` RAPID Andrew Carroll 1 sibling, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread From: Andrew Carroll @ 2004-03-28 13:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: comp.lang.ada Okay, I found a path problem. I also uninstalled Borland C++ 5.0. Not that 'that' had anything to do with it. Before I continue banging my head against gnatmake, let me address something you wrote. >> Yes, GNAT 3.15p comes with Win32Ada binding. Hmmm, okay....so I don't need to try and build Win32Ada myself? See, I read somewhere in all the "umpteen" web sites that Win32Ada was needed for something. Either AdaGIDE needed it, or RAPID needed it, or A# needed it. I don't remember, it's been to many hours since I read it. So if Win32Ada is "__built__ into" AdaGIDE then I don't need to build it. Right? I can stop with all the "linker problem" stuff? My next question, based on the RAPID web site. ftp://ftp.usafa.af.mil/pub/dfcs/carlisle/usafa/rapid/index.html NOT http://wuarchive.wustl.edu/languages/ada/usafa/rapid/ Which are different. Carlisle's web site (usafa) says: "(Current implementations utilize the TASH binding to Tcl/Tk, the GNAT to JVM compiler, the Microsoft .NET framework, or GtkAda)." :-), I'm laughing... Does that mean I need TASH, Tcl/Tk "AND" GNAT to JVM "AND" Framework "OR ELSE" Does that mean I need TASH, Tcl/Tk "AND" GNAT to JVM "AND" GtkAda "NOT" the Framework "OR ELSE" Does that mean I need TASH and Tcl/Tk "OR" GNAT to JVM "AND THEN" Framework "OR" GtkAda ???? :-) The wuarchive says it like this: "(Current implementations utilize the TASH binding to Tcl/Tk, the GNAT to JVM compiler, or GNAT for JVM compiler. " With no closing parenthesis. Are you sure we need the GNAT "to" JVM compiler and not the GNAT "for" JVM compiler? What are the chances that the links go to the same "GNAT to/for JVM" compiler page? You gotta be kidding me! Andrew ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* RAPID [not found] <20040328100010.A912D4C40A0@lovelace.ada-france.org> 2004-03-28 13:00 ` Win32Ada Linker Problem Andrew Carroll @ 2004-03-28 16:17 ` Andrew Carroll 1 sibling, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread From: Andrew Carroll @ 2004-03-28 16:17 UTC (permalink / raw) To: comp.lang.ada Anyone know how Root_Type_Access is supposed to be defined in the Gtk.ads file? Anyone know why gtk-signal.ads, gtk-signal.adb are no longer in the gtk includes? I am now trying to build RAPID. Seems that there are some problems. It is time to quit now. It is time for food and sleep.... Bye bye Andrew Carroll andrew@carroll-tech.net ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* RAPID @ 2021-04-12 16:56 Thomas 2021-04-12 17:58 ` RAPID Shark8 2021-04-12 20:40 ` RAPID Björn Lundin 0 siblings, 2 replies; 17+ messages in thread From: Thomas @ 2021-04-12 16:56 UTC (permalink / raw) Hi :-) courtesy Oliver Kellogg, i'm officially the new RAPID maintainer :-) i would like to know if there still exists some RAPID users :-) i also would like to know if there are some users of other platforms than Unix or Windows who would like to use RAPID, even if it doesn't work until now. i see that GtkAda supports at least Solaris/sparc platform, in addition to Unix and Windows, but if no one is interested i won't waste time on a specific portability. tell me :-) -- RAPID maintainer http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/rapid/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: RAPID 2021-04-12 16:56 RAPID Thomas @ 2021-04-12 17:58 ` Shark8 2021-04-12 18:04 ` RAPID Thomas 2021-04-15 22:09 ` RAPID Thomas 2021-04-12 20:40 ` RAPID Björn Lundin 1 sibling, 2 replies; 17+ messages in thread From: Shark8 @ 2021-04-12 17:58 UTC (permalink / raw) On Monday, April 12, 2021 at 10:56:55 AM UTC-6, Thomas wrote: > courtesy Oliver Kellogg, > i'm officially the new RAPID maintainer :-) > i would like to know if there still exists some RAPID users :-) > > > i also would like to know if there are some users of other platforms > than Unix or Windows who would like to use RAPID, even if it doesn't > work until now. > > i see that GtkAda supports at least Solaris/sparc platform, in addition > to Unix and Windows, > but if no one is interested i won't waste time on a specific portability. > tell me :-) I'm on Windows and Solaris and Linux here, we might get Macintosh from long-term visitors. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: RAPID 2021-04-12 17:58 ` RAPID Shark8 @ 2021-04-12 18:04 ` Thomas 2021-04-12 20:01 ` RAPID Shark8 2021-04-15 22:09 ` RAPID Thomas 1 sibling, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread From: Thomas @ 2021-04-12 18:04 UTC (permalink / raw) In article <31164e74-92d2-4424-9248-e6360dff9f4bn@googlegroups.com>, Shark8 <onewingedshark@gmail.com> wrote: > On Monday, April 12, 2021 at 10:56:55 AM UTC-6, Thomas wrote: > > courtesy Oliver Kellogg, > > i'm officially the new RAPID maintainer :-) > > i would like to know if there still exists some RAPID users :-) > > > > > > i also would like to know if there are some users of other platforms > > than Unix or Windows who would like to use RAPID, even if it doesn't > > work until now. > > > > i see that GtkAda supports at least Solaris/sparc platform, in addition > > to Unix and Windows, > > but if no one is interested i won't waste time on a specific portability. > > tell me :-) > > I'm on Windows and Solaris and Linux here, we might get Macintosh from > long-term visitors. ok :-) what's your relation with RAPID ? (are you a user ? are you interested ? ...) -- RAPID maintainer http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/rapid/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: RAPID 2021-04-12 18:04 ` RAPID Thomas @ 2021-04-12 20:01 ` Shark8 2021-04-12 21:28 ` RAPID Thomas 0 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread From: Shark8 @ 2021-04-12 20:01 UTC (permalink / raw) On Monday, April 12, 2021 at 12:04:53 PM UTC-6, Thomas wrote: > In article <31164e74-92d2-4424>, > Shark8 wrote: > > > On Monday, April 12, 2021 at 10:56:55 AM UTC-6, Thomas wrote: > > > courtesy Oliver Kellogg, > > > i'm officially the new RAPID maintainer :-) > > > i would like to know if there still exists some RAPID users :-) > > > > > > > > > i also would like to know if there are some users of other platforms > > > than Unix or Windows who would like to use RAPID, even if it doesn't > > > work until now. > > > > > > i see that GtkAda supports at least Solaris/sparc platform, in addition > > > to Unix and Windows, > > > but if no one is interested i won't waste time on a specific portability. > > > tell me :-) > > > > I'm on Windows and Solaris and Linux here, we might get Macintosh from > > long-term visitors. > ok :-) > > what's your relation with RAPID ? > (are you a user ? are you interested ? ...) Not a user, currently. But interested, and having a nice cross-platform common-UI would make things a lot nicer for some prospective software-upgrades at work. One such possible nicety would be a universal administration tool, another would be a data-management/-analysis tool for visiting scientists, another possibility would be decoupling several control-programs (codebases in everything from C to VB to C#) used to operate the instrumentation here from their host-systems and increase portability. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: RAPID 2021-04-12 20:01 ` RAPID Shark8 @ 2021-04-12 21:28 ` Thomas 2021-04-15 14:12 ` RAPID Shark8 0 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread From: Thomas @ 2021-04-12 21:28 UTC (permalink / raw) In article <cc5120b0-152b-4639-aa13-dfdba1d6007dn@googlegroups.com>, Shark8 <onewingedshark@gmail.com> wrote: > On Monday, April 12, 2021 at 12:04:53 PM UTC-6, Thomas wrote: > > In article <31164e74-92d2-4424>, > > Shark8 wrote: > > > I'm on Windows and Solaris and Linux here, we might get Macintosh from > > > long-term visitors. > > ok :-) > > > > what's your relation with RAPID ? > > (are you a user ? are you interested ? ...) > Not a user, currently. > But interested, and having a nice cross-platform common-UI would make things > a lot nicer for some prospective software-upgrades at work. ok :-) > One such possible nicety would be a universal administration tool, another > would be a data-management/-analysis tool for visiting scientists, another > possibility would be decoupling several control-programs (codebases in > everything from C to VB to C#) used to operate the instrumentation here from > their host-systems and increase portability. not sure to understand all what theese tools are doing, do you think that you understood what RAPID does, and that it could help you to make all UI of theese tools ? i would like to ask you to try to compile RAPID and test it, before i need to ask you: - if you have a subversion client. on Linux it shouldn't be a problem. that's only for the time you want to test my patches, you needn't it for public versions. for the other platforms you should be able to copy the code internally, from the Linux one. - which kind of graphical toolkits are available, on each platform you need to run RAPID (or what it will have generated). i don't think it's important your tools are currently using the same toolkit than RAPID, if you plan to re-do UI from sratch, but i may be wrong. -- RAPID maintainer http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/rapid/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: RAPID 2021-04-12 21:28 ` RAPID Thomas @ 2021-04-15 14:12 ` Shark8 2021-04-15 18:48 ` RAPID Thomas 0 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread From: Shark8 @ 2021-04-15 14:12 UTC (permalink / raw) On Monday, April 12, 2021 at 3:28:15 PM UTC-6, Thomas wrote: > In article <cc5120b0-152b-4639>, > Shark8 wrote: > > > On Monday, April 12, 2021 at 12:04:53 PM UTC-6, Thomas wrote: > > > In article <31164e74-92d2-4424>, > > > Shark8 wrote: > > > > > I'm on Windows and Solaris and Linux here, we might get Macintosh from > > > > long-term visitors. > > > ok :-) > > > > > > what's your relation with RAPID ? > > > (are you a user ? are you interested ? ...) > > > Not a user, currently. > > But interested, and having a nice cross-platform common-UI would make things > > a lot nicer for some prospective software-upgrades at work. > ok :-) > > One such possible nicety would be a universal administration tool, another > > would be a data-management/-analysis tool for visiting scientists, another > > possibility would be decoupling several control-programs (codebases in > > everything from C to VB to C#) used to operate the instrumentation here from > > their host-systems and increase portability. > not sure to understand all what theese tools are doing, > > do you think that you understood what RAPID does, > and that it could help you to make all UI of theese tools ? Perhaps I should explain: where I am we have a system that was grown over the space of 30 years, portions are custom programs, portions are things like cron-jobs. I would ultimately like to clean things up so that there is minimal dependence on OSes, allowing us to change out as-needed, and using a single language (Ada) to increase maintainability and correctness/consistency of the system. > i would like to ask you to try to compile RAPID and test it, > > > before i need to ask you: > > - if you have a subversion client. > on Linux it shouldn't be a problem. > that's only for the time you want to test my patches, you needn't it for > public versions. > for the other platforms you should be able to copy the code internally, > from the Linux one. Hm, I see... it might take me a bit to set up a linux computer for such use; we have training for new personnel and the computer I would use is time-shared with operations, so I'll have to make sure the system is free when I want to do things. > - which kind of graphical toolkits are available, on each platform you > need to run RAPID (or what it will have generated). I'm not entirely sure about the full set yet; the most-used UI for the system is a Java program, run under Solaris. > i don't think it's important your tools are currently using the same > toolkit than RAPID, if you plan to re-do UI from sratch, but i may be > wrong. > -- > RAPID maintainer > http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/rapid/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: RAPID 2021-04-15 14:12 ` RAPID Shark8 @ 2021-04-15 18:48 ` Thomas 2021-04-16 7:16 ` RAPID Björn Lundin 0 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread From: Thomas @ 2021-04-15 18:48 UTC (permalink / raw) In article <a190b236-0957-44e6-8d29-b8b244304173n@googlegroups.com>, Shark8 <onewingedshark@gmail.com> wrote: > On Monday, April 12, 2021 at 3:28:15 PM UTC-6, Thomas wrote: > > In article <cc5120b0-152b-4639>, > > Shark8 wrote: > > > > > One such possible nicety would be a universal administration tool, > > > another > > > would be a data-management/-analysis tool for visiting scientists, > > > another > > > possibility would be decoupling several control-programs (codebases in > > > everything from C to VB to C#) used to operate the instrumentation here > > > from > > > their host-systems and increase portability. > > not sure to understand all what theese tools are doing, > > > > do you think that you understood what RAPID does, > > and that it could help you to make all UI of theese tools ? > Perhaps I should explain: where I am we have a system that was grown over the > space of 30 years, portions are custom programs, portions are things like > cron-jobs. > I would ultimately like to clean things up so that there is minimal > dependence on OSes, allowing us to change out as-needed, and using a single > language (Ada) to increase maintainability and correctness/consistency of the > system. so you might like HAC Ada Compiler :-) (it seems to be an interpreter rather than a Compiler) i don't use it myself, but someone on the french ada list said that it is very nice to use instead of Bash https://hacadacompiler.sourceforge.io/ > > > i would like to ask you to try to compile RAPID and test it, > > > > > > before i need to ask you: > > > > - if you have a subversion client. > > on Linux it shouldn't be a problem. > > that's only for the time you want to test my patches, you needn't it for > > public versions. > > for the other platforms you should be able to copy the code internally, > > from the Linux one. > Hm, I see... it might take me a bit to set up a linux computer for such use; > we have training for new personnel and the computer I would use is > time-shared with operations, so I'll have to make sure the system is free > when I want to do things. the important point is the subversion client. you may find it for your platform, or you may create a virtual machine on your computer, with Linux as guest. if it's too dificult, i can send you zip files instead. > > > - which kind of graphical toolkits are available, on each platform you > > need to run RAPID (or what it will have generated). > I'm not entirely sure about the full set yet; the most-used UI for the system > is a Java program, run under Solaris. ok. is it required to continue to use Java UI via ada, or are you able to replace it by any available UI ? currently, RAPID knows only GtkAda (2.24.4 for the moment) and Tash. but it is designed to easily add more graphical toolkits. there was a peer for java. i removed it because it was made for Ada-Java Interfacing Suite, which is not free, so I can't afford to maintain it. but if you need it, it's easy to recover what i removed (then if you need my help i'll need an access to your computer) i think there was a peer for a Windows-specific graphical toolkits too, anyway we can imagine it. if you create a virtual machine, you can use ubuntu 16.04, it's the one i currently use to maintain RAPID, so it has the right version of GtkAda -- RAPID maintainer http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/rapid/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: RAPID 2021-04-15 18:48 ` RAPID Thomas @ 2021-04-16 7:16 ` Björn Lundin 0 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread From: Björn Lundin @ 2021-04-16 7:16 UTC (permalink / raw) Den 2021-04-15 kl. 20:48, skrev Thomas: > the important point is the subversion client. > you may find it for your platform, or you may create a virtual machine > on your computer, with Linux as guest. > We use Svnkit <https://svnkit.com> - a pure Java svn client for our AIX servers. Should work on Solaris too -- Björn ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: RAPID 2021-04-12 17:58 ` RAPID Shark8 2021-04-12 18:04 ` RAPID Thomas @ 2021-04-15 22:09 ` Thomas 2021-04-16 6:46 ` RAPID Emmanuel Briot 1 sibling, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread From: Thomas @ 2021-04-15 22:09 UTC (permalink / raw) In article <31164e74-92d2-4424-9248-e6360dff9f4bn@googlegroups.com>, Shark8 <onewingedshark@gmail.com> wrote: > On Monday, April 12, 2021 at 10:56:55 AM UTC-6, Thomas wrote: > > i also would like to know if there are some users of other platforms > > than Unix or Windows who would like to use RAPID, even if it doesn't > > work until now. > > > > i see that GtkAda supports at least Solaris/sparc platform, in addition > > to Unix and Windows, > > but if no one is interested i won't waste time on a specific portability. > > tell me :-) > > I'm on Windows and Solaris and Linux here, we might get Macintosh from > long-term visitors. i need your help to allow me to make RAPID as portable as possible, please :-) * Solaris for me, Solaris is obscure, but Wikipédia says it's an Unix operating system, so it is UNIX could you confirm to me that access to the filesystem is like Linux, please ? this way, nothing special to do with filesystem for Solaris :-) Gtk may look&feel a bit special, like on Macintosh, but nothing avoiding to use it. * Windows as far as i know, Windows is not UNIX, and the access to the filesystem is *not* like Linux there was a fix here : http://svn.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/rapid?view=revision&revision=147 i want to improve "access to the filesystem" management, using Ada.Directories rather than "&" and GNAT.OS_Lib.Directory_Separator. the big problem I have, is that i can't test the result on Windows because i don't have it, so i can't know if, doing that, i revert this fix ... before i detail it more, tell me if you're available to help me. maybe you know, via your experience with ada on Windows, what i need to know without needing to test it :-) -- RAPID maintainer http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/rapid/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: RAPID 2021-04-15 22:09 ` RAPID Thomas @ 2021-04-16 6:46 ` Emmanuel Briot 2021-04-16 7:31 ` RAPID Dmitry A. Kazakov 2021-04-19 23:34 ` RAPID Thomas 0 siblings, 2 replies; 17+ messages in thread From: Emmanuel Briot @ 2021-04-16 6:46 UTC (permalink / raw) > * Windows > the big problem I have, is that i can't test the result on Windows > because i don't have it, so i can't know if, doing that, i revert this > fix ... You should install a virtual machine to test your software with Windows, that's the only way. Microsoft offers for free such machines, with a limited lifespan (so you will have to download and reinstall every few months, but that's a starting point). You might also be able to get a full version of windows using the software from an older PC. https://developer.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/downloads/virtual-machines/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: RAPID 2021-04-16 6:46 ` RAPID Emmanuel Briot @ 2021-04-16 7:31 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov 2021-04-19 23:55 ` RAPID Thomas 2021-04-19 23:34 ` RAPID Thomas 1 sibling, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread From: Dmitry A. Kazakov @ 2021-04-16 7:31 UTC (permalink / raw) On 2021-04-16 08:46, Emmanuel Briot wrote: >> * Windows >> the big problem I have, is that i can't test the result on Windows >> because i don't have it, so i can't know if, doing that, i revert this >> fix ... > > You should install a virtual machine to test your software with Windows, that's the only way. > Microsoft offers for free such machines, with a limited lifespan (so you will have to download and reinstall every few months, but > that's a starting point). You might also be able to get a full version of windows using the software from an older PC. Right, it could even be a Windows 7, rather that Windows 10. GUI stuff is fully compatible. There are lots of old licenses from dead machines people re-sell on ebay. MS frowns on this, but AFAIK it is legal, at least in the EU it likely is. P.S. If you want to support 32-bit Windows as well, you will need GNAT Pro or else stick with a very old GNAT GPL edition. The old GNAT GPL is just fine, unless you wanted newer Ada 2012 toys... -- Regards, Dmitry A. Kazakov http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: RAPID 2021-04-16 7:31 ` RAPID Dmitry A. Kazakov @ 2021-04-19 23:55 ` Thomas 0 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread From: Thomas @ 2021-04-19 23:55 UTC (permalink / raw) In article <s5begs$3ri$1@gioia.aioe.org>, "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> wrote: > On 2021-04-16 08:46, Emmanuel Briot wrote: > >> * Windows > >> the big problem I have, is that i can't test the result on Windows > >> because i don't have it, so i can't know if, doing that, i revert this > >> fix ... > > > > You should install a virtual machine to test your software with Windows, > > that's the only way. > P.S. If you want to support 32-bit Windows as well, you will need GNAT > Pro or else stick with a very old GNAT GPL edition. The old GNAT GPL is > just fine, unless you wanted newer Ada 2012 toys... i would like access to newer Ada 2012 toys :-) more generally, i don't want to test my software on a platforms list as long as possible. i want to conceptually make it as portable as possible, and then i hope users will report bugs, this way, i'll be able to enhance portability :-) the specific problem i have, is that there was already a fix, and that it wouldn't be fine to revert it while improving other thing ... that's why i hope someone could help me just for this fix, even without looking at my software :-) -- RAPID maintainer http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/rapid/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: RAPID 2021-04-16 6:46 ` RAPID Emmanuel Briot 2021-04-16 7:31 ` RAPID Dmitry A. Kazakov @ 2021-04-19 23:34 ` Thomas 1 sibling, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread From: Thomas @ 2021-04-19 23:34 UTC (permalink / raw) In article <3b402b1b-a831-4195-a613-aa8b592a5339n@googlegroups.com>, Emmanuel Briot <briot.emmanuel@gmail.com> wrote: > Microsoft offers for free such machines, with a limited lifespan (so you will > have to download and reinstall every few months, but > that's a starting point). You might also be able to get a full version of > windows using the software from an older PC. > > https://developer.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/downloads/virtual-machines/ thank you, i didn't know it :-) but it doesn't work on my old mac, it's an OVA, and my VirtualBox 4.3.40 does support only OVF. anyway it's not sure it would have worked, since with ubuntu it makes kernel panics since ubuntu 18.4 hopefully i should change my computer soon :-) -- RAPID maintainer http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/rapid/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: RAPID 2021-04-12 16:56 RAPID Thomas 2021-04-12 17:58 ` RAPID Shark8 @ 2021-04-12 20:40 ` Björn Lundin 2021-04-12 21:51 ` RAPID Thomas 1 sibling, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread From: Björn Lundin @ 2021-04-12 20:40 UTC (permalink / raw) Den 2021-04-12 kl. 18:56, skrev Thomas: > Hi :-) > > > courtesy Oliver Kellogg, > i'm officially the new RAPID maintainer :-) > I looked at the links, and hmm, it looked abandoned. Is it alive and kicking? What are the plans for it? -- Björn ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: RAPID 2021-04-12 20:40 ` RAPID Björn Lundin @ 2021-04-12 21:51 ` Thomas 0 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread From: Thomas @ 2021-04-12 21:51 UTC (permalink / raw) In article <s52b7d$g9s$1@dont-email.me>, Björn Lundin <b.f.lundin@gmail.com> wrote: > Den 2021-04-12 kl. 18:56, skrev Thomas: > > Hi :-) > > > > > > courtesy Oliver Kellogg, > > i'm officially the new RAPID maintainer :-) > > > > I looked at the links, and hmm, it looked abandoned. I haven't had time to make a new public version yet. you can have a look at my work via subversion : http://svn.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/rapid/branches/gtkada-2.24/ > Is it alive and kicking? hum ... depends on your criteria ;-) > What are the plans for it? 1st, i want to update it to the most recent tools, notably GtkAda. (by the way i found some bugs and i'll made some little improvements.) -- RAPID maintainer http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/rapid/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-04-19 23:55 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 17+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- [not found] <20040328100010.A912D4C40A0@lovelace.ada-france.org> 2004-03-28 13:00 ` Win32Ada Linker Problem Andrew Carroll 2004-03-28 16:17 ` RAPID Andrew Carroll 2021-04-12 16:56 RAPID Thomas 2021-04-12 17:58 ` RAPID Shark8 2021-04-12 18:04 ` RAPID Thomas 2021-04-12 20:01 ` RAPID Shark8 2021-04-12 21:28 ` RAPID Thomas 2021-04-15 14:12 ` RAPID Shark8 2021-04-15 18:48 ` RAPID Thomas 2021-04-16 7:16 ` RAPID Björn Lundin 2021-04-15 22:09 ` RAPID Thomas 2021-04-16 6:46 ` RAPID Emmanuel Briot 2021-04-16 7:31 ` RAPID Dmitry A. Kazakov 2021-04-19 23:55 ` RAPID Thomas 2021-04-19 23:34 ` RAPID Thomas 2021-04-12 20:40 ` RAPID Björn Lundin 2021-04-12 21:51 ` RAPID Thomas
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox