Re: Pool and SubPools can be used for remote access ?

["Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de>]

On 2021-03-07 02:26, Daniel Norte Moraes wrote:
> Em sábado, 6 de março de 2021 às 17:22:34 UTC-3, Dmitry A. Kazakov escreveu:
>> On 2021-03-06 20:48, Daniel Norte Moraes wrote:
>>
>>> I'm learning mpi and openMP and take this insite:
>>> ? Is possible to use remote data ( e.g. shared memory , variables etc [
>>> via network and other protocols]) by implementing
>>> an custom storage_pool's ? the array in storage pool need be continuous or
>>> an 'fake-length' array is ok ? someone already tried it yet ?
>> Storage pool can be backed by whatever mechanism. The layout of objects
>> allocated in the pool depends on the object. The strategy could be
>> mirroring remote objects or using proxy object instead.
>>
>> As for implementations there exist distributed annex implementations
>> which must support remote objects.
> 
>   Beyond polyorb, there other implentations ? can you cite some ?

Not that I am aware of. The distributed annex is defined in a way that 
any network protocol could be used if it has RPC or if you could put an 
RPC layer on top of it, even HTTP POST (:-))

>> There exist persistent storage implementations. Persistent objects
>> resemble remote objects in many aspects.
>>
> can cite some?

http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de/ada/components.htm#2

>> There exist interprocess shared storage pools implementation.
>>
> can cite some ?

http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de/ada/components.htm#12.8

-- 
Regards,
Dmitry A. Kazakov
http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de