Re: Pool and SubPools can be used for remote access ?

[Daniel Norte Moraes <danielcheagle@gmail.com>]

Em sábado, 6 de março de 2021 às 17:22:34 UTC-3, Dmitry A. Kazakov escreveu:
> On 2021-03-06 20:48, Daniel Norte Moraes wrote: 
> 
> > I'm learning mpi and openMP and take this insite: 
> > ? Is possible to use remote data ( e.g. shared memory , variables etc [ 
> > via network and other protocols]) by implementing 
> > an custom storage_pool's ? the array in storage pool need be continuous or 
> > an 'fake-length' array is ok ? someone already tried it yet ?
> Storage pool can be backed by whatever mechanism. The layout of objects 
> allocated in the pool depends on the object. The strategy could be 
> mirroring remote objects or using proxy object instead. 
> 
> As for implementations there exist distributed annex implementations 
> which must support remote objects. 

 Beyond polyorb, there other implentations ? can you cite some ?

> 
> There exist persistent storage implementations. Persistent objects 
> resemble remote objects in many aspects. 
> 

can cite some?

> There exist interprocess shared storage pools implementation. 
> 
can cite some ?

> If remote objects should be implemented as stored in a pool is quite 
> questionable. Pool is too low level mechanism. Having an object in a 
> pool would preclude a lot of functionality, safety and reliability. 
> 
> -- 
> Regards, 
> Dmitry A. Kazakov 
> http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de

Thanks !