Re: Pool and SubPools can be used for remote access ?

[Daniel Norte Moraes <danielcheagle@gmail.com>]

Em domingo, 7 de março de 2021 às 05:30:38 UTC-3, Dmitry A. Kazakov escreveu:
> On 2021-03-07 02:26, Daniel Norte Moraes wrote: 
> > Em sábado, 6 de março de 2021 às 17:22:34 UTC-3, Dmitry A. Kazakov escreveu: 
> >> On 2021-03-06 20:48, Daniel Norte Moraes wrote: 
> >> 
> >>> I'm learning mpi and openMP and take this insite: 
> >>> ? Is possible to use remote data ( e.g. shared memory , variables etc [ 
> >>> via network and other protocols]) by implementing 
> >>> an custom storage_pool's ? the array in storage pool need be continuous or 
> >>> an 'fake-length' array is ok ? someone already tried it yet ? 
> >> Storage pool can be backed by whatever mechanism. The layout of objects 
> >> allocated in the pool depends on the object. The strategy could be 
> >> mirroring remote objects or using proxy object instead. 
> >> 
> >> As for implementations there exist distributed annex implementations 
> >> which must support remote objects. 
> > 
> > Beyond polyorb, there other implentations ? can you cite some ?
> Not that I am aware of. The distributed annex is defined in a way that 
> any network protocol could be used if it has RPC or if you could put an 
> RPC layer on top of it, even HTTP POST (:-))
> >> There exist persistent storage implementations. Persistent objects 
> >> resemble remote objects in many aspects. 
> >> 
> > can cite some?
> http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de/ada/components.htm#2
> >> There exist interprocess shared storage pools implementation. 
> >> 
> > can cite some ?
> http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de/ada/components.htm#12.8
> -- 
> Regards, 
> Dmitry A. Kazakov 
> http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de


A ReallyThanks! ^^

Best Wishes,
Dani.