Re: Possible Ada deficiency?

[Pascal Obry <pascal@obry.net>]

"Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> writes:

> You mean that there is a non-Ada body. But for Import I would provide an
> Ada body and place the pragma there (if that should be a pragma). Later one
> could replace the body with an Ada implementation and vise versa *without*
> touching specifications.

Ok, but it seems wrong to me to hide Export/Import. This is definitly part of
the interface. Reviewers/Users must know if this is imported or not. Idem for
Inline, this is really part of the spec and tells you that the code will be
inline in yours. If you have size considerations for your code it seems quite
important to note this just by reading the spec.

Just my 2 cents,
Pascal.

-- 

--|------------------------------------------------------
--| Pascal Obry                           Team-Ada Member
--| 45, rue Gabriel Peri - 78114 Magny Les Hameaux FRANCE
--|------------------------------------------------------
--|              http://www.obry.org
--| "The best way to travel is by means of imagination"
--|
--| gpg --keyserver wwwkeys.pgp.net --recv-key C1082595