From: Martin Krischik <krischik@users.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: Is this definition legal?
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 09:58:44 +0200
Date: 2004-09-21T09:58:44+02:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1546680.FBpzpKpu0v@linux1.krischik.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 87k6uo27bm.fsf@deneb.enyo.de
Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Martin Krischik:
>
>> Currently it is mostly a "Ada.Containers" discussion list. But is is a
>> list for both changes and clarifications.
>
> It's not clear if a clarification of the standard is needed here.
True - most of us have agreed it is a compiler bug.
> Surely ada-comment is not the list to ask random questions about the
> standard!
Sure - Beginners questions should not be ask at ada-comment. I see it like
this: If nobody at here c.l.a knows the answer then the question is
sufficiently complex or the answer sufficiently hidden in the RM for query
at ada-comment.
So in that respect Bjï¿œrn did of corse do the right think to raise question
here first.
With Rergards
Martin
--
mailto://krischik@users.sourceforge.net
http://www.ada.krischik.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-09-21 7:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-09-18 23:29 Is this definition legal? Björn Persson
2004-09-18 23:44 ` Ludovic Brenta
2004-09-19 14:07 ` Björn Persson
2004-09-19 20:21 ` Ludovic Brenta
2004-09-23 21:18 ` Björn Persson
2004-09-19 14:17 ` Björn Persson
2004-09-19 8:42 ` Martin Krischik
2004-09-19 11:25 ` Simon Wright
2004-09-20 7:32 ` Martin Krischik
2004-09-20 13:44 ` Björn Persson
2004-09-20 16:01 ` Martin Krischik
2004-09-20 21:20 ` Randy Brukardt
2004-09-20 17:12 ` Florian Weimer
2004-09-21 7:58 ` Martin Krischik [this message]
2004-09-19 11:30 ` Simon Wright
2004-09-19 11:53 ` Martin Dowie
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox