From: Martin Krischik <krischik@users.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: Is this definition legal?
Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2004 10:42:52 +0200
Date: 2004-09-19T10:42:52+02:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8119488.4vhKC6FDza@linux1.krischik.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Vx33d.3580$d5.27722@newsb.telia.net
Bjï¿œrn Persson wrote:
> My first question is: Is this definition of Character_Encoding legal and
"Legal" questions should be send to ada-comment@ada-auth.org. They are the
guys who can not only "advice" but also "decide" on such issues.
Of course you should join the list (listserv@ada-auth.org) otherwise you
never see the answer.
With Regards
Martin
--
mailto://krischik@users.sourceforge.net
http://www.ada.krischik.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-09-19 8:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-09-18 23:29 Is this definition legal? Björn Persson
2004-09-18 23:44 ` Ludovic Brenta
2004-09-19 14:07 ` Björn Persson
2004-09-19 20:21 ` Ludovic Brenta
2004-09-23 21:18 ` Björn Persson
2004-09-19 14:17 ` Björn Persson
2004-09-19 8:42 ` Martin Krischik [this message]
2004-09-19 11:25 ` Simon Wright
2004-09-20 7:32 ` Martin Krischik
2004-09-20 13:44 ` Björn Persson
2004-09-20 16:01 ` Martin Krischik
2004-09-20 21:20 ` Randy Brukardt
2004-09-20 17:12 ` Florian Weimer
2004-09-21 7:58 ` Martin Krischik
2004-09-19 11:30 ` Simon Wright
2004-09-19 11:53 ` Martin Dowie
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox