From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
Subject: Re: Is this definition legal?
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 19:12:13 +0200
Date: 2004-09-20T19:12:13+02:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87k6uo27bm.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 2617548.neE1jZqPik@linux1.krischik.com
* Martin Krischik:
> Currently it is mostly a "Ada.Containers" discussion list. But is is a list
> for both changes and clarifications.
It's not clear if a clarification of the standard is needed here.
Surely ada-comment is not the list to ask random questions about the
standard!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-09-20 17:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-09-18 23:29 Is this definition legal? Björn Persson
2004-09-18 23:44 ` Ludovic Brenta
2004-09-19 14:07 ` Björn Persson
2004-09-19 20:21 ` Ludovic Brenta
2004-09-23 21:18 ` Björn Persson
2004-09-19 14:17 ` Björn Persson
2004-09-19 8:42 ` Martin Krischik
2004-09-19 11:25 ` Simon Wright
2004-09-20 7:32 ` Martin Krischik
2004-09-20 13:44 ` Björn Persson
2004-09-20 16:01 ` Martin Krischik
2004-09-20 21:20 ` Randy Brukardt
2004-09-20 17:12 ` Florian Weimer [this message]
2004-09-21 7:58 ` Martin Krischik
2004-09-19 11:30 ` Simon Wright
2004-09-19 11:53 ` Martin Dowie
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox