From: "Martin Dowie" <martin.dowie@btopenworld.com>
Subject: Re: Is this definition legal?
Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2004 11:53:32 +0000 (UTC)
Date: 2004-09-19T11:53:32+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cijrvs$d9e$1@sparta.btinternet.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Vx33d.3580$d5.27722@newsb.telia.net
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 164 bytes --]
Bj�rn Persson wrote:
> GCC-Gnat 3.4.0 is having serious problems with the definition of
> Character_Encoding below:
Compiles fine on ObjectAda 7.2.2 (U14).
prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-09-19 11:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-09-18 23:29 Is this definition legal? Björn Persson
2004-09-18 23:44 ` Ludovic Brenta
2004-09-19 14:07 ` Björn Persson
2004-09-19 20:21 ` Ludovic Brenta
2004-09-23 21:18 ` Björn Persson
2004-09-19 14:17 ` Björn Persson
2004-09-19 8:42 ` Martin Krischik
2004-09-19 11:25 ` Simon Wright
2004-09-20 7:32 ` Martin Krischik
2004-09-20 13:44 ` Björn Persson
2004-09-20 16:01 ` Martin Krischik
2004-09-20 21:20 ` Randy Brukardt
2004-09-20 17:12 ` Florian Weimer
2004-09-21 7:58 ` Martin Krischik
2004-09-19 11:30 ` Simon Wright
2004-09-19 11:53 ` Martin Dowie [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox