Re: Is this definition legal?

["Björn Persson" <spam-away@nowhere.nil>]

Martin Krischik wrote:

> Simon Wright wrote:
> 
>>Martin Krischik <krischik@users.sourceforge.net> writes:
>>
>>>"Legal" questions should be send to ada-comment@ada-auth.org. They
>>>are the guys who can not only "advice" but also "decide" on such
>>>issues.
>>
>>I'm not sure this is good advice, isn't that list for discussion of
>>proposals for changes to the standard?
> 
> Currently it is mostly a "Ada.Containers" discussion list. But is is a list
> for both changes and clarifications.

I thought Ada-comment would be appropriate if I could point to a 
paragraph in the reference manual that needed clarification. That's not 
the case. Anyway, if ObjectAda and Gnat 3.15p accept the code, I suppose 
it's legal.

-- 
Björn Persson                              PGP key A88682FD
                    omb jor ers @sv ge.
                    r o.b n.p son eri nu