From: "Randy Brukardt" <randy@rrsoftware.com>
Subject: Re: Is this definition legal?
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 16:20:28 -0500
Date: 2004-09-20T16:20:28-05:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Nr-dnXUM25H01NLcRVn-iA@megapath.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: S8B3d.3680$d5.28757@newsb.telia.net
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 617 bytes --]
"Bj�rn Persson" <spam-away@nowhere.nil> wrote in message
news:S8B3d.3680$d5.28757@newsb.telia.net...
>I thought Ada-comment would be appropriate if I could point to a
>paragraph in the reference manual that needed clarification. That's not
>the case.
You're right in the sense that Ada-Comment is not a place for asking random
questions about code. If a compiler had rejected the code and cited some
paragraph in the standard, you certainly could (and should) ask about it.
But its definitely not a place to discuss bug boxes in particular compilers.
Randy Brukardt
ARG Editor
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-09-20 21:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-09-18 23:29 Is this definition legal? Björn Persson
2004-09-18 23:44 ` Ludovic Brenta
2004-09-19 14:07 ` Björn Persson
2004-09-19 20:21 ` Ludovic Brenta
2004-09-23 21:18 ` Björn Persson
2004-09-19 14:17 ` Björn Persson
2004-09-19 8:42 ` Martin Krischik
2004-09-19 11:25 ` Simon Wright
2004-09-20 7:32 ` Martin Krischik
2004-09-20 13:44 ` Björn Persson
2004-09-20 16:01 ` Martin Krischik
2004-09-20 21:20 ` Randy Brukardt [this message]
2004-09-20 17:12 ` Florian Weimer
2004-09-21 7:58 ` Martin Krischik
2004-09-19 11:30 ` Simon Wright
2004-09-19 11:53 ` Martin Dowie
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox