comp.lang.ada
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
Search results ordered by [date|relevance]  view[summary|nested|Atom feed]
			download mbox.gz: |
   1. Re: [ANNOUNCE] XML/Ada 0.5 released
      - by dewar @ 2001-05-04 17:21 UTC [66%]

   2. Re: [ANNOUNCE] XML/Ada 0.5 released
      - by dewar @ 2001-05-04 15:32 UTC [65%]

   3. Re: [ANNOUNCE] XML/Ada 0.5 released
      - by dewar @ 2001-05-04 16:14 UTC [62%]

   4. Re: [ANNOUNCE] XML/Ada 0.5 released
      - by dewar @ 2001-05-04 15:34 UTC [60%]

   5. Re: Help B* and B+ Trees
      - by Charles Hixson @ 1998-05-15  0:00 UTC [57%]

   6. Re: C++ to Ada Link Problems
      - by James Huckaby @ 1998-02-27  0:00 UTC [57%]

   7. C++ Class
      - by Loc Minh Phan Van @ 1997-02-12  0:00 UTC [57%]

   8. Re: Ada News Brief - 96-05-24.txt [1/1]
      - by Richard Riehle @ 1996-06-04  0:00 UTC [57%]

   9. Re: Ada95 Streams Question
      - by sam @ 1996-07-02  0:00 UTC [57%]

  10. Re: Q: Generating Documenation from Ada Sources?
      - by Michael Erdmann @ 2002-05-11 19:07 UTC [56%]

  11. Re: Development process in the Ada community
      - by Michael Erdmann @ 2002-04-28 14:18 UTC [56%]

  12. Re: Is Ada likely to survive ?
      - by Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz @ 1997-07-21  0:00 UTC [56%]

  13. Re: Reading a line of arbitrary length
      - by Brian Rogoff @ 1997-02-16  0:00 UTC [56%]

  14. Re: Urgent question: malloc and ada...
      - by Charles Hixson @ 1998-05-01  0:00 UTC [55%]

  15. Re: Relational Operators
      - by David Starner @ 2001-10-29 19:31 UTC [55%]

  16. Re: ACT announces availability of GNAT 3.14p
      - by Leon Winslow @ 2002-02-03  8:07 UTC [55%]

  17. Re: Ada 95 - the interpretation of the Gnu 'copy left'
      - by John H. Lindsay @ 1997-10-31  0:00 UTC [55%]

  18. Re: OO, C++, and something much better!
      - by James O'Connor @ 1997-01-26  0:00 UTC [54%]

  19. Re: C++ to Ada Link Problems
      - by James Huckaby @ 1998-02-27  0:00 UTC [53%]

  20. Re: acceder au NETBIOS avec ADA
      - by sam @ 1996-11-28  0:00 UTC [53%]

  21. Re: Asynchronous Transfer of Control
      - by m193884 @ 1996-10-29  0:00 UTC [51%]

  22. Re: Ada 95 - the interpretation of the Gnu 'copy left'
      - by John Lindsay @ 1997-10-29  0:00 UTC [51%]

  23. Re: [ANNOUNCE] XML/Ada 0.5 released
      - by David Botton @ 2001-05-04 14:06 UTC [51%]

  24. Re: [ANNOUNCE] XML/Ada 0.5 released
      - by David Botton @ 2001-05-04 14:02 UTC [50%]

  25. Re: The Red Language
      - by Dean F. Sutherland @ 1997-09-11  0:00 UTC [50%]

  26. Re: Pthreads in GNAT
      - by Robert W. Brewer @ 1995-04-21  0:00 UTC [50%]

  27. Re: Does Ada95 beat FORTRAN?!?
      - by Theodore E. Dennison @ 1996-04-22  0:00 UTC [50%]

  28. Re: OO, C++, and something much better!
      - by James O'Connor @ 1997-01-26  0:00 UTC [49%]

  29. Re: Bounded strings yield huge object files.
      - by Bobby D. Bryant @ 1997-08-28  0:00 UTC [49%]

  30. Re: Which compiler is correct??
      - by Robert B. Love  @ 1996-09-11  0:00 UTC [47%]

  31. Re: Air traffic control system in Java
      - by Rick @ 2011-03-06 22:47 UTC [47%]

  32. Re: Rules for Representation of Subtypes
      - by Ken Garlington @ 1996-10-02  0:00 UTC [47%]

  33. RE: [ANNOUNCE] XML/Ada 0.5 released
      - by dewar @ 2001-05-07 15:53 UTC [46%]

  34. Re: Question for the folks who designed Ada95
      - by Geert Bosch @ 1999-04-29  0:00 UTC [45%]

  35. Re: Does memory leak?
      - by Theodore Dennison @ 1995-03-27 14:01 UTC [45%]

  36. Re: [ANNOUNCE] XML/Ada 0.5 released
      - by David Botton @ 2001-05-04 16:56 UTC [45%]

  37. Re: Ada95 to ANSI_C converter
      - by Arthur Schwarz @ 1997-04-07  0:00 UTC [45%]

  38. Re: C vs Ada code quality
      - by Valentin Bonnard @ 1997-05-01  0:00 UTC [44%]

  39. Re: Garbage colletion
      - by Didier Utheza @ 1999-11-04  0:00 UTC [44%]

  40. Re: Ada on MVS
      - by Pascal Sartoretti @ 1998-12-21  0:00 UTC [43%]

  41. Ada used to develop Medical Analytical Systems
      - by Phil Snarski @ 1996-04-04  0:00 UTC [43%]

  42. Re: DOS ALSYS ADA and DOS=HIGH
      - by Rick Ballard @ 1994-09-08 13:45 UTC [42%]

  43. Re: Printing Enum Variable Re: Linux World
      - by David Botton @ 1999-03-05  0:00 UTC [41%]

  44. Re: Simple Case Study in Types. Chords.
      - by David W. Glessner @ 1999-12-06  0:00 UTC [41%]

  45. Re: ADA compiler on Mac?
      - by Arthur Evans Jr @ 1994-10-19 13:12 UTC [41%]

  46. Re: C vs Ada code quality
      - by Valentin Bonnard @ 1997-04-26  0:00 UTC [40%]

  47. Re: Gnat  Free ?
      - by Van Snyder @ 1998-10-22  0:00 UTC [40%]

  48. Re: general comment on CLA
      - by Samuel Tardieu @ 1997-09-21  0:00 UTC [40%]

  49. RE: [ANNOUNCE] XML/Ada 0.5 released
      - by Robert C. Leif, Ph.D. @ 2001-05-07  7:21 UTC [39%]

  50. ADA, Windows NT and Real-Time (was  GNAT R/T Annex and Win95)
      - by Brian K. Catlin @ 1996-04-20  0:00 UTC [37%]

  51. Re: what means the " ' " in use with a record type?
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-08-26 20:43 UTC [22%]

  52. Re: what means the " ' " in use with a record type?
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-08-26 20:41 UTC [22%]

  53. Re: stupid question: how can I finish a program?
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-08-25  2:22 UTC [22%]

  54. Re: best way to handle long strings!?
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-08-24 21:48 UTC [22%]

  55. Re: Decimal Floating types
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-08-23  3:23 UTC [22%]

  56. Re: Ada 95 for an ARM-based bare board?
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-08-23  3:14 UTC [22%]

  57. Re: Fill string with multiple lines from standard_input
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-08-21 19:47 UTC [22%]

  58. Re: Ada 95 for an ARM-based bare board?
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-08-21 19:44 UTC [22%]

  59. Re: Ada 95 for an ARM-based bare board?
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-08-21 19:34 UTC [22%]

  60. Re: Ada 95 for an ARM-based bare board?
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-08-20 18:32 UTC [22%]

  61. Re: Decimal Floating types
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-08-20  0:26 UTC [22%]

  62. Re: Point of Information was RE: POLL: Would you use Ada more if...
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-08-20  0:17 UTC [22%]

  63. Re: 64-bit integers in Ada
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-08-20  0:15 UTC [22%]

  64. Re: Fill string with multiple lines from standard_input
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-08-20  0:03 UTC [22%]

  65. Re: Ada 95 for an ARM-based bare board?
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-08-17 15:55 UTC [22%]

  66. Re: Information Systems Annex was RE: Dispatching and generics -
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-08-17 14:17 UTC [22%]

  67. Re: best way to handle long strings!?
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-08-17 10:57 UTC [22%]

  68. Re: Information Systems Annex (usefulness of Decimal Floats)
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-08-17 10:56 UTC [22%]

  69. Re: Fill string with multiple lines from standard_input
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-08-17 10:24 UTC [22%]

  70. Re: POLL: Would you use Ada more if...
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-08-17 10:14 UTC [22%]

  71. Re: POLL: Would you use Ada more if...
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-08-17 10:12 UTC [22%]

  72. Re: stupid question: how can I finish a program?
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-08-15 18:41 UTC [22%]

  73. Re: stupid question: how can I finish a program?
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-08-15  1:47 UTC [22%]

  74. Re: Visibility of private packages??
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-08-14 17:03 UTC [22%]

  75. Re: GNAT/Ada95 Streams Performance Issue
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-08-13 21:11 UTC [22%]

  76. Re: GNAT/Ada95 Streams Performance Issue
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-08-13  8:25 UTC [22%]

  77. Re: GNAT question
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-08-12 23:51 UTC [22%]

  78. Re: GNAT/Ada95 Streams Performance Issue
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-08-12 23:49 UTC [22%]

  79. Re: JGNAT status??? (Volunteers?)
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-08-12 23:47 UTC [22%]

  80. Re: Floating point representation-help
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-08-12 23:43 UTC [22%]

  81. Re: GNAT question
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-08-12 12:37 UTC [22%]

  82. Re: JGNAT status??? (was: Re: Help: Problem with JGnat)
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-08-04 14:18 UTC [22%]

  83. Re: [ot... well kindof] SDI
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-08-04 14:16 UTC [22%]

  84. Re: creating a 16 bit value from 2 8 bit values in Ada
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-08-03 14:37 UTC [22%]

  85. Re: Help: Problem with JGnat
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-08-02 18:37 UTC [22%]

  86. Re: Erroneous execution? (was Re: gnat: time-slicing)
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-08-02  4:17 UTC [22%]

  87. Re: Multiple interface inheritance workaround in Ada 95 / Ada 0x   to satisfy a Java language advocate?
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-07-30 20:55 UTC [22%]

  88. Re: Zeller's Algorithm
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-07-30  4:35 UTC [22%]

  89. Re: GNAT documentation question
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-07-29 11:01 UTC [22%]

  90. Re: Slices of 2d arrays? +HPF
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-07-28 23:54 UTC [22%]

  91. Re: GNAT documentation question
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-07-28 19:09 UTC [22%]

  92. Re: Dispatching and generics - language lawyer question
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-07-25  0:40 UTC [22%]

  93. Re: Passing Unconstrained Arrays from FORTRAN to an Ada95 subunit
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-07-22  1:48 UTC [22%]

  94. Re: source beautifier
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-07-20 11:32 UTC [22%]

  95. Re: Ada.Task_Identification.Abort_Task (Environment_Task) ;
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-07-13 22:12 UTC [22%]

  96. Re: if X in 1..35000 versus Boolean
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-07-13 22:10 UTC [22%]

  97. Re: Problem with Gnat.Dynamic_Tables
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-07-12  3:42 UTC [22%]

  98. Re: Problem with Gnat.Dynamic_Tables
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-07-11 15:13 UTC [22%]

  99. Re: Smart sorting algorithm ?
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-07-09  4:35 UTC [22%]

 100. Re: GNAT on SPARC
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-07-06 18:30 UTC [22%]

 101. Re: Creating really small binaries?
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-06-26  8:08 UTC [22%]

 102. Re: Is there a Graphical IDE to GNAT 3.14p (Win2K platform)?
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-06-10  2:21 UTC [22%]

 103. Re: Ada -vs- GNAT
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-06-09 18:05 UTC [22%]

 104. Re: Ada -vs- GNAT
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-06-09 12:13 UTC [22%]

 105. Re: Is there a Graphical IDE to GNAT 3.14p (Win2K platform)?
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-06-08 12:21 UTC [22%]

 106. Re: Is there a Graphical IDE to GNAT 3.14p (Win2K platform)?
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-06-08 12:21 UTC [22%]

 107. Re: HELP: PC System Call
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-06-08 12:17 UTC [22%]

 108. Re: HELP: PC System Call
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-06-08 12:16 UTC [22%]

 109. Re: Ada -vs- GNAT
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-06-08 12:14 UTC [22%]

 110. Re: Commercial C To Ada 95 compiler
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-06-08 12:06 UTC [22%]

 111. Re: Ada compiler for protected-mode 80286?
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-06-08 12:02 UTC [22%]

 112. Re: Syntactically correct spanish identifiers (Was: config files proposal)
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-06-07 15:37 UTC [22%]

 113. Re: Can any body clarify me !!
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-06-06  1:52 UTC [22%]

 114. Re: Ada has no continual line(s) ??
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-05-31  3:30 UTC [22%]

 115. Re: Je n'ai jamais programmer un j'ai un programme  à  faire j'ai besoin d'aide si quelqu'un peut M'aider
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-05-30 12:22 UTC [22%]

 116. Re: Extended modal types
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-05-29 23:36 UTC [22%]

 117. Re: Record help
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-05-29  9:57 UTC [22%]

 118. Re: Extended modal types
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-05-29  9:54 UTC [22%]

 119. Re: Sockets
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-05-29  1:28 UTC [22%]

 120. Re: slice'access?
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-05-26 14:22 UTC [22%]

 121. Re: Ada -vs- GNAT
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-05-26  2:05 UTC [22%]

 122. Re: ON Topic: Ada for CP/M
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-05-25 22:57 UTC [22%]

 123. Re: Microsoft takes on ACT
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-05-25 22:41 UTC [22%]

 124. Re: Sockets
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-05-25 15:58 UTC [22%]

 125. Re: OT: Microsoft takes on history
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-05-25 15:41 UTC [22%]

 126. Re: OT: Microsoft takes on history
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-05-25 15:40 UTC [22%]

 127. Re: Ada -vs- GNAT
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-05-25 15:35 UTC [22%]

 128. Re: Ada -vs- GNAT
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-05-25 15:34 UTC [22%]

 129. Re: Help with Copying Shared Memory to Local
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-05-25 11:23 UTC [22%]

 130. Re: Ada -vs- GNAT
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-05-25 11:04 UTC [22%]

 131. Re: Sockets
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-05-23  2:34 UTC [22%]

 132. Re: Can you use arrays from another package ?
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-05-22 22:22 UTC [22%]

 133. Re: Can you use arrays from another package ?
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-05-22  1:52 UTC [22%]

 134. Re: GCC 3.1 released
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-05-19  5:53 UTC [22%]

 135. Re: Unusual syntax
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-05-19  4:30 UTC [22%]

 136. Re: Byte order writing to socket stream
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-05-18 20:30 UTC [22%]

 137. Re: gcc 3.1
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-05-18 20:29 UTC [22%]

 138. Re: Gnat filenaming
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-05-18 20:22 UTC [22%]

 139. Re: Would an *AdaScript* language be a good / bad idea?
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-05-18  2:54 UTC [22%]

 140. Re: Problems with Ada.Real_Time on GNAT?
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-05-18  2:49 UTC [22%]

 141. Re: 64-bit integers in Ada
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-05-17  2:28 UTC [22%]

 142. Re: Ada Compilers
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-05-17  1:23 UTC [22%]

 143. Re: Ada Compilers
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-05-17  1:22 UTC [22%]

 144. Re: Ada Compilers
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-05-17  1:19 UTC [22%]

 145. Re: GCC 3.1 released
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-05-16 22:08 UTC [22%]

 146. Re: Would an *AdaScript* language be a good / bad idea?
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-05-15  5:32 UTC [22%]

 147. Re: Generation of permutations (copyright)
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-05-14 23:27 UTC [22%]

 148. Re: [OT] Gnat cross compiling FreeBSD to Win32 ?
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-05-14 14:13 UTC [22%]

 149. Re: Q: Generating Documenation from Ada Sources?
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-05-11 18:29 UTC [22%]

 150. Re: OT:GNAT (Re: GPS - A new kind of IDE?)
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-05-11 12:43 UTC [22%]

 151. Re: Generation of permutations
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-05-11  4:05 UTC [22%]

 152. Re: GPS - A new kind of IDE?
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-05-10 13:16 UTC [22%]

 153. Re: Generation of permutations
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-05-10 13:13 UTC [22%]

 154. Re: Sinclair Spectrum - what everyone wants?
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-05-08  3:49 UTC [22%]

 155. Re: Static expression question
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-05-08  3:15 UTC [22%]

 156. Re: [OT] ettiquite - was gprof with gnat
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-05-08  2:29 UTC [22%]

 157. Re: Generation of permutations
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-05-07 10:39 UTC [22%]

 158. Re: Generation of permutations
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-05-06 21:33 UTC [22%]

 159. Re: Gnat cross compiling FreeBSD to Win32 ?
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-05-06  0:48 UTC [22%]

 160. Re: Executable size with GNAT for Windows and Linux
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-05-06  0:44 UTC [22%]

 161. Re: Building GNAT from CVS
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-05-05  0:40 UTC [22%]

 162. Re: gprof with gnat
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-05-04  2:07 UTC [22%]

 163. Re: GNAT Programming System - Wow
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-05-03  8:54 UTC [22%]

 164. Re: gprof with gnat
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-05-02 11:53 UTC [22%]

 165. Re: How to Build Existing Code Using Apex
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-04-30 23:02 UTC [22%]

 166. Re: Hanging compilation
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-04-30  2:45 UTC [22%]

 167. Re: Ada a fourth generation language?
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-04-28 23:47 UTC [22%]

 168. Re: Case statement and Integers.
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-04-24 11:41 UTC [22%]

 169. Re: Bug in GNAT.Socket.Check_Selector in GNAT 3.14 Linux runtime
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-04-22 17:39 UTC [22%]

 170. Re: Open Source: in conflict with the development process in the Ada community?
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-04-22 13:42 UTC [22%]

 171. Re: Development process in the Ada community
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-04-22 13:40 UTC [22%]

 172. Re: System.Address'Size - not a static integer expression?
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-04-22 13:24 UTC [22%]

 173. Re: Case statement and Integers.
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-04-22 13:16 UTC [22%]

 174. Re: Case statement and Integers.
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-04-22  3:01 UTC [22%]

 175. Re: type or subtype?
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-04-19 11:52 UTC [22%]

 176. Re: type or subtype?
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-04-18  4:50 UTC [22%]

 177. Re: Rant! (was) Development process in the Ada community
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-04-13  3:30 UTC [22%]

 178. Re: Rant! (was) Development process in the Ada community
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-04-13  0:59 UTC [22%]

 179. Re: Newbie: Best Ada Compiler for MS Windows ?
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-04-10  4:08 UTC [22%]

 180. Re: Requeue
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-04-08  5:00 UTC [22%]

 181. Re: Interfacing ADA to C++ classes with parameters
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-04-05 15:44 UTC [22%]

 182. Re: Missing **-operator in GNAT 3.14?
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-04-03  1:02 UTC [22%]

 183. Re: Ada Dot Net ?
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-04-03  0:56 UTC [22%]

 184. Re: Ada Dot Net ?
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-04-03  0:50 UTC [22%]

 185. Re: Missing **-operator in GNAT 3.14?
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-04-02 17:07 UTC [22%]

 186. Re: Missing **-operator in GNAT 3.14?
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-04-02 16:18 UTC [22%]

 187. Re: Ada for Palm ?
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-03-26  0:42 UTC [22%]

 188. Re: Ada for Palm ?
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-03-23  3:28 UTC [22%]

 189. Re: System.Address'Size - not a static integer expression?
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-03-07  1:21 UTC [22%]

 190. Re: 3.14p Binary for OS/2. Was: Will there be a 3.14p version of GNAT?
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-03-04 10:41 UTC [22%]

 191. Re: 64bit access to an array of 8bit values
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-03-04 10:31 UTC [22%]

 192. Re: Converting Char to Enum
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-03-03 16:43 UTC [22%]

 193. Re: Complexity of protected objects
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-03-03  1:08 UTC [22%]

 194. Re: 3.14p Binary for OS/2. Was: Will there be a 3.14p version of GNAT?
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-03-02 17:00 UTC [22%]

 195. Re: The making of compilers
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-03-01  5:02 UTC [22%]

 196. Re: The making of compilers
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-03-01  5:00 UTC [22%]

 197. Re: Why not using [] instead of () for array?
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-02-27  4:54 UTC [22%]

 198. Re: bit shift
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-02-25 18:08 UTC [22%]

 199. Re: patch to Gnat 3.14p NT posted
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-02-25  6:07 UTC [22%]

 200. Re: Ada Operating System
      - by Robert Dewar @ 2002-02-23  3:11 UTC [22%]


Results 1-200 of ~7510   | reverse | options above

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox