201. Re: Paradise-3.4 ported to GNAT/Ada9X?
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-10-24 4:50 UTC [22%]
202. Re: Private/incomplete type differences...?
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-10-24 15:45 UTC [22%]
203. Re: compilation time [was Re: Magnavox consult
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-10-25 22:23 UTC [22%]
204. Re: compilation time [was Re: Magnavox consultant]
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-10-25 23:33 UTC [22%]
205. Re: Generic Child Packages
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-10-26 0:05 UTC [22%]
206. Re: Flags in Ada?
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-10-26 11:01 UTC [20%]
207. Re: Flags in Ada?
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-10-26 14:33 UTC [21%]
208. Re: Interfaces.Fortran
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-10-26 22:28 UTC [20%]
209. Re: Lines of documentation per LOC
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-10-26 22:30 UTC [22%]
210. Re: Flags in Ada?
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-10-26 22:32 UTC [22%]
211. Re: Flags in Ada?
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-10-27 13:29 UTC [17%]
212. Re: Flags in Ada?
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-10-27 13:47 UTC [21%]
213. Re: Flags in Ada?
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-10-27 23:00 UTC [22%]
214. Re: Ada replacements for DOS I/O
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-10-27 23:04 UTC [20%]
215. Re: Initialization Params for Controlled Types
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-10-27 23:06 UTC [22%]
216. Re: Easily-Read C++?
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-10-27 23:09 UTC [21%]
217. Re: Flags in Ada?
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-10-28 3:51 UTC [20%]
218. Re: Flags in Ada?
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-10-28 13:43 UTC [17%]
219. Re: Another One Bites the Dust!
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-10-28 16:04 UTC [17%]
220. Re: Access type representations.
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-10-28 16:52 UTC [21%]
221. Re: Flags in Ada?
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-10-30 13:31 UTC [22%]
222. Re: Elaboration
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-10-30 13:39 UTC [19%]
223. Re: Say it isn't so! (Formerly: Ada replacements for DOS I/O)
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-10-30 15:31 UTC [16%]
224. Re: Access type representations.
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-10-30 16:02 UTC [21%]
225. Re: Interfaces.Fortran
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-10-30 17:19 UTC [18%]
226. Re: SOLVED! Decoupled Mutual Recursion Challenger
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-10-31 13:17 UTC [21%]
227. Re: Ada replacements for DOS I/O
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-10-31 13:21 UTC [22%]
228. Re: Interfaces.Ada
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-11-03 11:15 UTC [21%]
229. Re: Interfaces.Ada
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-11-03 11:18 UTC [20%]
230. Re: Ada replacements for DOS I/O
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-11-03 11:23 UTC [20%]
231. Re: Flags in Ada?
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-11-03 11:26 UTC [22%]
232. Re: Type System.ADDRESS
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-11-03 11:30 UTC [22%]
233. Re: Type System.ADDRESS
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-11-03 11:31 UTC [22%]
234. Re: DOS GNAT 1.83 returns 'unknown file type' on compilation
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-11-03 11:34 UTC [22%]
235. Re: Another One Bites the Dust!
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-11-03 11:36 UTC [22%]
236. Re: Ada replacements for DOS I/O
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-11-03 23:05 UTC [22%]
237. Re: Flags in Ada?
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-11-03 23:08 UTC [22%]
238. Re: Paige's How To Get An Automatic Ada Waiver memo
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-11-03 23:10 UTC [21%]
239. Re: Ada replacements for DOS I/O
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-11-05 5:37 UTC [22%]
240. Re: WE NEED A GOOD Ada SORT PACKAGE!
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-11-05 5:43 UTC [21%]
241. Re: Ada replacements for DOS I/O
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-11-06 21:03 UTC [21%]
242. Re: POSIX and symbolic links ????
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-11-06 21:04 UTC [22%]
243. Re: GNAT and AdaSage
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-11-12 2:12 UTC [21%]
244. Re: GNAT-Problem Set_Line(), Set_Col()
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-11-12 15:49 UTC [22%]
245. Re: Systemless use of 'Address.
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-11-12 20:38 UTC [20%]
246. Re: GNAT-Problem / Please Help !!
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-11-13 12:41 UTC [21%]
247. Re: Installing GNAT 1.83 on DOS
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-11-15 17:27 UTC [19%]
248. Re: Command line package for Alsys Ada Compiler
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-11-16 13:46 UTC [22%]
249. Re: GNAT-Problem Set_Line(), Set_Col()
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-11-16 13:48 UTC [22%]
250. Re: Why don't large companies use Ada?
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-11-16 23:47 UTC [18%]
251. Re: Systemless use of 'Address.
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-11-16 23:50 UTC [22%]
252. Re: SGI inheriting C++ classes ...
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-11-19 7:12 UTC [20%]
253. Re: GNAT for Mac?
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-11-19 7:15 UTC [22%]
254. Re: GNAT-Problem / Please Help !!
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-11-19 7:19 UTC [21%]
255. Re: Ada Portability... NOT!
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-11-19 16:55 UTC [17%]
256. Re: Range Check Query
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-11-19 16:58 UTC [20%]
257. Re: GNAT for Mac?
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-11-19 17:07 UTC [17%]
258. Re: Command line package for Alsys Ada Compiler
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-11-19 23:34 UTC [21%]
259. Re: defaults on discriminants
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-11-20 17:14 UTC [19%]
260. Re: Why don't large companies use Ada?
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-11-20 17:18 UTC [20%]
261. Re: Why don't large companies use Ada?
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-11-20 17:21 UTC [20%]
262. Re: Delphi and SGI's GNAT Ada access of C++ class libraries
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-11-21 1:45 UTC [21%]
263. Re: Ada Portability... NOT!
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-11-21 13:17 UTC [20%]
264. Re: Delphi and SGI's GNAT Ada access of C++ class libraries
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-11-22 3:52 UTC [22%]
265. Re: Ada Portability... NOT!
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-11-22 3:53 UTC [22%]
266. Re: Why don't large companies use Ada?
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-11-22 13:56 UTC [15%]
267. Re: SGI inheriting C++ classes ...
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-11-22 14:24 UTC [20%]
268. Re: PART/pthreads for GNAT under Linux
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-11-23 21:56 UTC [22%]
269. Re: Why don't large companies use Ada?
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-11-28 14:00 UTC [22%]
270. Re: Why don't large companies use Ada?
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-11-28 14:02 UTC [22%]
271. Re: Help Wanted
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-11-28 15:42 UTC [22%]
272. Re: Interesting OS/2 product for GNAT users....
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-11-29 0:32 UTC [20%]
273. Availability of GNAT version 2.0
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-11-29 13:17 UTC [18%]
274. Re: Multithreading
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-11-29 13:19 UTC [21%]
275. Re: Ada crosscompiler for a Intel 386 target
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-11-29 13:22 UTC [20%]
276. Re: Help with gnat IO
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-11-29 22:05 UTC [18%]
277. Re: cross linking packages
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-11-29 22:07 UTC [22%]
278. Re: GNAT
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-11-30 23:01 UTC [22%]
279. Re: What is OO (Was Why don't large companies use Ada?)
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-11-30 23:26 UTC [22%]
280. Re: Why don't large companies use Ada?
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-12-01 21:02 UTC [19%]
281. Re: Why don't large companies use Ada?
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-12-01 21:24 UTC [22%]
282. Re: Why don't large companies use Ada?
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-12-01 22:29 UTC [16%]
283. Re: Why don't large companies use Ada?
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-12-02 5:25 UTC [22%]
284. Re: Why don't large companies use Ada?
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-12-02 5:29 UTC [22%]
285. Re: s-algol
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-12-02 14:09 UTC [22%]
286. Re: HELP: GNAT for HP 9000/755.
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-12-03 2:57 UTC [22%]
287. Re: Why don't large companies use Ada?
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-12-05 22:57 UTC [22%]
288. Re: Why don't large companies use Ada?
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-12-05 22:59 UTC [22%]
289. Re: Running GNAT from the VB3 Shell Command
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-12-05 23:03 UTC [22%]
290. Re: Why don't large companies use Ada?
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-12-06 13:22 UTC [21%]
291. cross-posting and selling Ada
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-12-06 13:31 UTC [18%]
292. Re: intermediate results causing constraint errors
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-12-06 13:40 UTC [18%]
293. Re: Reference Counting (was Re: Searching Method for Incremental Garbage Collection)
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-12-06 14:15 UTC [22%]
294. Re: GNAT (v1.83 and v2.0) and Booch Components
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-12-06 14:16 UTC [22%]
295. Re: Elaboration order [was: cross linking packages]
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-12-06 16:11 UTC [22%]
296. Re: Using procedures
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-12-07 23:35 UTC [22%]
297. Re: Why don't large companies use Ada?
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-12-08 4:10 UTC [22%]
298. Re: Why don't large companies use Ada?
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-12-08 4:11 UTC [22%]
299. Re: Why don't large companies use Ada?
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-12-08 10:48 UTC [21%]
300. Re: Why don't large companies use Ada?
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-12-08 10:49 UTC [22%]
301. Re: Why don't large companies use Ada?
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-12-08 10:51 UTC [22%]
302. Re: GNAT problem: Hello World
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-12-08 20:05 UTC [22%]
303. Re: GNAT Port To WIN or WINNT?
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-12-09 4:37 UTC [22%]
304. Re: Why don't large companies use Ada?
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-12-09 11:49 UTC [19%]
305. Re: GNAT-Problem '+'-operator with Count
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-12-09 15:33 UTC [22%]
306. Re: Running GNAT from the VB3 Shell Command
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-12-09 15:36 UTC [22%]
307. Re: Anybody else having problems with GNAT 2 and OS2 Warp?
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-12-09 21:56 UTC [22%]
308. Re: iSUB in PL/I (was: Re: Why don't large <you-know-whats> use <you-know what>?)
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-12-10 1:36 UTC [22%]
309. Re: intermediate results causing constraint errors
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-12-10 13:41 UTC [20%]
310. Re: Robert Dewar's horrible posts
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-12-10 13:43 UTC [22%]
311. Re: Why don't large companies use Ada?
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-12-10 13:50 UTC [22%]
312. Re: Why don't large companies use Ada?
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-12-10 13:51 UTC [22%]
313. Re: Why don't large companies use C/C++/OOP?
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-12-10 13:56 UTC [21%]
314. Re: Ada Run-Time Royalties - Opinions?
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-12-12 4:29 UTC [22%]
315. Re: Free Ada compiler for PC wanted
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-12-12 4:30 UTC [22%]
316. Re: Terseness
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-12-12 4:39 UTC [21%]
317. Re: Rational releases a C++/Smalltalk tool ???
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-12-12 4:44 UTC [20%]
318. Re: PM bindings for OS/2 gnat?
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-12-12 4:57 UTC [22%]
319. Re: Ada can't initialize (aggregate) array of length 1?
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-12-14 3:21 UTC [22%]
320. Re: Ada can't initialize (aggregate) array of length 1?
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-12-14 3:23 UTC [21%]
321. Re: Marketing Ada: Is the Sky Falling?
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-12-14 13:17 UTC [22%]
322. Re: Marketing Ada: Is the Sky Falling?
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-12-14 20:34 UTC [22%]
323. Re: Digital and Ada ?
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-12-16 4:41 UTC [22%]
324. Re: Conformance problem in VAX Ada?
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-12-16 13:49 UTC [19%]
325. Re: Addressing functions
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-12-16 14:53 UTC [19%]
326. Re: Marketing Ada
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-12-16 14:54 UTC [22%]
327. Re: How does the Ada 95 Streams package Index?
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-12-16 15:16 UTC [20%]
328. Re: Addressing functions
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-12-16 16:56 UTC [20%]
329. Re: Tri-Ada CD ROM Gnat for DOS
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-12-17 1:17 UTC [22%]
330. Re: GNAT-2.00 for FreeBSD 1.1.5, NetBSD and BSDI386 available
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-12-17 15:08 UTC [22%]
331. Re: Addressing functions
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-12-17 17:27 UTC [22%]
332. Re: Addressing functions
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-12-17 17:32 UTC [21%]
333. Re: Array mappings
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-12-17 17:41 UTC [18%]
334. Re: In search of Set/Get Variable reference tool
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-12-17 17:43 UTC [22%]
335. Re: Question about IO on Unix-machines
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-12-17 17:44 UTC [22%]
336. Re: Ada can't initialize (aggregate) array of length 1?
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-12-17 17:52 UTC [18%]
337. Re: Reference Counting (was Re: Searching Method for Incremental Garbage Collection)
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-12-17 20:36 UTC [22%]
338. Re: Reaching traditional engineering, was: Array mappings
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-12-18 1:34 UTC [22%]
339. Re: PL/1 vs PL/I (Re: Why don't large companies use Ada?)
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-12-18 13:47 UTC [22%]
340. Re: Marketing Ada
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-12-18 15:17 UTC [22%]
341. Re: Array mappings
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-12-19 3:41 UTC [16%]
342. Re: Array mappings
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-12-19 3:46 UTC [20%]
343. Re: Ada can't initialize (aggregate) array of length 1?
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-12-19 14:20 UTC [16%]
344. Re: Array mappings
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-12-19 14:27 UTC [18%]
345. Re: Array mappings
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-12-20 14:09 UTC [18%]
346. Re: GNAT and gdb
- by Robert Dewar @ 1994-12-21 4:55 UTC [21%]
347. Re: GNAT not 'getting' CR or LF?
- by Robert Dewar @ 1995-01-02 4:42 UTC [22%]
348. Re: Language Lawyers help on rep_specs
- by Robert Dewar @ 1995-01-03 15:06 UTC [22%]
349. Re: Language Lawyers help on rep_specs
- by Robert Dewar @ 1995-01-03 18:04 UTC [22%]
350. Re: Language Lawyers help on rep_specs
- by Robert Dewar @ 1995-01-03 18:07 UTC [22%]
351. Re: FORTRAN Translation to Ada
- by Robert Dewar @ 1995-01-04 1:13 UTC [22%]
352. Re: Avionic Proximity Warning
- by Robert Dewar @ 1995-01-04 18:48 UTC [22%]
353. Re: GNAT NT 2.0c & LINK32 vs. LINK
- by Robert Dewar @ 1995-01-05 17:38 UTC [20%]
354. Re: "Subtract C, add Ada"
- by Robert Dewar @ 1995-01-05 23:56 UTC [22%]
355. Re: Programming Libraries in Ada
- by Robert Dewar @ 1995-01-06 20:44 UTC [22%]
356. Re: Data Format Brainstorm
- by Robert Dewar @ 1995-01-07 14:45 UTC [21%]
357. Re: Reference Manual ?
- by Robert Dewar @ 1995-01-08 14:13 UTC [19%]
358. Re: GNAT NT & Ada.Direct_IO
- by Robert Dewar @ 1995-01-09 6:07 UTC [20%]
359. Re: GNAT NT & Ada.Direct_IO
- by Robert Dewar @ 1995-01-09 6:10 UTC [22%]
360. Re: Task Scheduling in Applications Written in Ada
- by Robert Dewar @ 1995-01-09 16:37 UTC [22%]
361. Re: Large Integers?
- by Robert Dewar @ 1995-01-11 2:39 UTC [22%]
362. Re: GNAT NT & Ada.Direct_IO
- by Robert Dewar @ 1995-01-12 13:57 UTC [19%]
363. Re: Run-time checking and speed
- by Robert Dewar @ 1995-01-12 14:13 UTC [16%]
364. Re: "No" Ada jobs in the Boston area
- by Robert Dewar @ 1995-01-12 14:18 UTC [19%]
365. Re: "No" Ada jobs in the Boston area
- by Robert Dewar @ 1995-01-12 14:20 UTC [21%]
366. Re: Ada.strings.bounded problems?
- by Robert Dewar @ 1995-01-12 14:24 UTC [21%]
367. Re: Ada to C translator
- by Robert Dewar @ 1995-01-12 16:10 UTC [20%]
368. Re: Ada.strings.bounded problems?
- by Robert Dewar @ 1995-01-12 18:10 UTC [21%]
369. Re: GNAT on Solaris: Help!
- by Robert Dewar @ 1995-01-12 18:50 UTC [18%]
370. Re: ADA-9x done? Any good PC compilers?
- by Robert Dewar @ 1995-01-12 22:14 UTC [21%]
371. Re: Ada.strings.bounded problems?
- by Robert Dewar @ 1995-01-12 22:17 UTC [22%]
372. Re: string literals
- by Robert Dewar @ 1995-01-12 22:21 UTC [21%]
373. Re: Strange behaviour with protected objects
- by Robert Dewar @ 1995-01-16 3:25 UTC [22%]
374. Re: string literals
- by Robert Dewar @ 1995-01-16 17:30 UTC [20%]
375. Re: Math Lib. for Ada? Ada for X11R6?
- by Robert Dewar @ 1995-01-16 17:53 UTC [21%]
376. Re: "Subtract C, add Ada"
- by Robert Dewar @ 1995-01-16 18:47 UTC [20%]
377. Re: C++ Envy
- by Robert Dewar @ 1995-01-16 18:48 UTC [22%]
378. Re: Ada.strings.bounded problems?
- by Robert Dewar @ 1995-01-18 5:01 UTC [22%]
379. Re: ADA Objects Help!
- by Robert Dewar @ 1995-01-18 17:47 UTC [20%]
380. Re: Ada.strings.bounded problems?
- by Robert Dewar @ 1995-01-18 17:48 UTC [22%]
381. Re: Ada95: New_Page at end of file
- by Robert Dewar @ 1995-01-18 23:16 UTC [20%]
382. Re: ADA-9x done? Any good PC compilers?
- by Robert Dewar @ 1995-01-18 23:17 UTC [22%]
383. Re: Large Integers?
- by Robert Dewar @ 1995-01-18 23:22 UTC [22%]
384. Re: Run-time checking and speed
- by Robert Dewar @ 1995-01-20 5:11 UTC [19%]
385. Re: Ada.strings.bounded problems?
- by Robert Dewar @ 1995-01-20 5:12 UTC [22%]
386. Re: Memory overwrite?
- by Robert Dewar @ 1995-01-20 5:19 UTC [22%]
387. Re: Need help with DEC Ada
- by Robert Dewar @ 1995-01-20 5:22 UTC [20%]
388. Re: Ada explanation?
- by Robert Dewar @ 1995-01-20 5:25 UTC [21%]
389. Re: Math Lib. for Ada? Ada for X11R6?
- by Robert Dewar @ 1995-01-20 5:27 UTC [22%]
390. Re: Ada Objects Help!
- by Robert Dewar @ 1995-01-20 16:52 UTC [22%]
391. Re: C programmer with Newbie question
- by Robert Dewar @ 1995-01-20 16:55 UTC [22%]
392. Re: pragma import problem ( also OS/2 : gnat 4emx )
- by Robert Dewar @ 1995-01-20 16:58 UTC [21%]
393. Re: Ada.strings.bounded problems?
- by Robert Dewar @ 1995-01-20 17:00 UTC [22%]
394. Re: string literals
- by Robert Dewar @ 1995-01-21 5:20 UTC [21%]
395. Re: Ada.strings.bounded problems?
- by Robert Dewar @ 1995-01-21 5:28 UTC [22%]
396. Re: ADA-9x done? Any good PC compilers?
- by Robert Dewar @ 1995-01-21 5:31 UTC [22%]
397. Re: "Subtract C, add Ada"
- by Robert Dewar @ 1995-01-21 15:18 UTC [18%]
398. Re: Ada.strings.bounded problems?
- by Robert Dewar @ 1995-01-21 18:57 UTC [16%]
399. Re: ADA Objects Help!
- by Robert Dewar @ 1995-01-21 18:59 UTC [21%]
400. Re: ADA Objects Help!
- by Robert Dewar @ 1995-01-22 18:06 UTC [14%]
Results 201-400 of ~7510 next (newer) | prev (older) | reverse | options above
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox